[FlingWingFlyer]

Red Square at UW. The commies aren’t hiding anything anymore.

[SSS Two]

From KOMO news:

In court documents, a senior prosecutor wrote that the couple "went to the event at the UW campus with the intent to provoke altercations with protesters who they knew would also be at this controversial event."

Court documents say a police investigation shows that Marc Hokoana sent a Facebook message on Jan 19, 2017, that read : "I can't wait until tomorrow. I'm going to the Milo event, and if the snowflakes get out of hand, I'm just going to wade through their ranks and start cracking skulls."

[SSS Two]

Seattle P-I adds:

"The defendants created a situation designed to allow Elizabeth Hokoana to shoot the victim in the middle of an extremely crowded event under the guise of defending herself of her husband," [Senior Deputy Prosecutor Mary] Barbosa went on to write. "The degree of planning involved in this crime demonstrates the danger that these defendants present to the community." Indeed detectives found Facebook messages sent by Marc Hokoana to a Facebook friend that morning, including:

"I can't wait for tomorrow, I'm going to the Milo event and if the snowflakes get out off (sic) hand I'm just going to wade through their ranks and start cracking skulls."

According to investigative records, Marc claimed his wife was going to be armed, but he wasn't, saying, "I'm going full melee."

[x1stcav]

Why do I have warm and fuzzy feelings about this.

[Rinnwald]

Satterberg is an anti-gun pussy. The guy that got shot basically admitted he was attacking the husband. The only purpose in this is to make the conservatives keep their guns at home and take their beatings quietly.

[Steve_Seattle]

I saw video of that event, and I saw leftists beating at least one other person. Why was no one charged with that?

[kiryandil]

"Cooperation from witnesses, including several people sending us video of the incident contributed to our detectives determining what happened.”

Left Coast kangaroo court - #FakeJudges, #FakeLaw - probably have suppressed any exculpatory evidence, and have hostile witnesses perjuring themselves.

[Steve_Seattle]

“The evidence will show that these defendants took a gun into a volatile protest in Red Square, and that Marc Hokoana engaged in several provocative acts, including using pepper spray on the crowd,”

This leads to several questions:

1. In what sense was the protest "volatile"? Was it because the protestors were engaging in violent acts?

2. Why did Mr. Hokoana use pepper spray? What was he responding to? the beating of someone (which I saw with my own eyes)? or being surrounded by a screaming mob, shouting obscenities?

3. I saw protestors beating up at least one person? ere they arrested? If not, why not?

4. Have you ever used pre-protest comments in the prosecution of a protestor?

5. Was the protest in itself "provocative," which you use as an argument against the defendant? Why is some "provocation" criminal, but not other provocation?

[jonrick46]

The focus of this case rests with the perception of imminent danger. I have talked about this situation with Dan Satterberg and he gave me the situations that he would interpret as imminent danger. I am sure Elizabeth Hokoana, with the right circumstances, fits into his interpretation. I understand the prosecution took all the videos of the incident and looked at them with great care. Some of the videos were electronically enhanced. After enhancement this audio was found:

The husband and wife can be seen talking to each other. An audio analyst was able to isolate the audio and told police that Hokoana tells his wife, “Calm down” and “don’t shoot anyone.” He then says to her, “They have to start this. They have to start it,” according to the analysis.

Now, we will get little details because it is now a felony case. I am hoping my FRiends can get more details . . .