I got tired of BOR, but I think a lot of what the Left has constructed as “sexual harassment”, legally or otherwise, is b/s.
I’m beginning to think “sexual harassment” should be confined to
1) proof of actual extortion of a female employee - “unless you do it, you’re gone” or
2) proof of truly unsolicited actual or attempted physical sexual touching
The “unsolicited” is a pretty big deal. I think women know what they’re up to and I think they usually can avoid a compromising situation if they want to. I think often they allow themselves to get into a potentially compromising situation and then later cry “Wolf” if it suits them.
And I think since women generally know when they choose to enter a potentially compromising situation, they can be prepared to prove legitimate “harassment” although they could also use the same device to entrap the guy (including subtle “soliciting”).
IMO, there’s a lot of b/s surrounding the sexual “harassment” thing. So many women have decided to climb into the ring with the guys to compete with them in the workplace. That in itself is potentially volatile. IMO, generally women don’t belong in the workplace competing with men, but if they do, then they should take the consequences.
In the meantime, it looks like we need a replacement for Fox News who stands up and fights for the restoration of America’s Free Constitutional Republic. Do we have any takers?
Now back in my day, women that dressed like that were found on ‘street corners’ to this day I cannot paint my toenails because my Victorian, Catholic Grandmother that raised me told me that only ‘street walkers’ did that...
I went to Catholic school, uniforms, and yes I still don't paint my toenails, I don't wear low blouses or shirts, tight fitting clothes, nor did I ‘rat’ my hair nor did I wear a lot of makeup...
So when women, like those on FNC, look like that, IMHO they are asking for whatever they get...
They are there to ‘report the news’ not make it...
Watch Fox and Friends with Ainsley Earhardt. When she gets going talking, her hands are all over Doocy and Kilmeade who obviously can't do anything but talk, smile and attempt a laugh. Definitely a double standard for females.
I agree with you about the stretching of “sexual harassment” to possibly include non-incidents. But, considering this is the climate of people being offended by American Flags, needing safe rooms to escape images of Donald Trump, colleges (and even some high schools), putting the “feelings” of the students ahead of all other goals and objectives.... and so on, then it is easier to see females potentially being more easily offended than in the past. This is the culture the left has worked hard to create, and with the cooperation of the MSM, they seem to be winning.
Completely agree with your assessment.
“IMO, generally women don’t belong in the workplace competing with men, but if they do, then they should take the consequences.”
Can you explain what you mean by this? What exactly is ‘competing with men in the workplace?’