Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMGFan

If the D wins, I suggest the house refuse to seat him. He doesn’t even live in the district. He states he has plans to move back to this district (just another month or two) when his girlfriend finishes school.

And that is quite telling in itself. It’s no longer something that kills your political chances to be living with a woman outside marriage.

Anyways he isn’t living in the district at the time of the election. I say don’t seat the prick.


2 posted on 04/18/2017 3:11:09 PM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BJ1

Isn’t living outside the district somewhat common? I mean they redraw the district lines all the time—especially once courts get involved.


6 posted on 04/18/2017 3:20:30 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1

“No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.” U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 2


7 posted on 04/18/2017 3:21:06 PM PDT by SMGFan (Sarah Michelle Gellar is on twitter @SarahMGellar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: All

Ossoff will, one way or the other, be in the run-off. The other person looks like Karen Handel - but yet the voting is still occurring.

My question is “Did the GOP candidates rip one another apart so badly in the primary that Ossoff may benefit from GOP turmoil over supporters of the other candidates not backing the GOP candidate in the run-off?”

Anyone have any insights on the ground battle in that area?


8 posted on 04/18/2017 3:22:53 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1

Unfortunately, Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution only requires the person elected to be an inhabitant of the state from which he is elected at the time he is elected. He does not have to live in the district from which he is elected.


16 posted on 04/18/2017 3:34:28 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1
There is no law nor rule that requires a candidate to live in the district. This is not exactly new nor unique. Others have run and not lived in the district. It happens more frequently after redistricting.

I recall a primary in Virginia in the last election in 2018. The republican did not live in the district and won the primary, but lost the general. The republican basically got redistricted by the federal courts and was an incumbent who decided to run in another district.

Not certain why this should disqualify him from representing his district if he wins. The voters will make that decision if they don't like him not living in the district.

26 posted on 04/18/2017 3:49:33 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1

There is no requirement that a Congresscritter must live in his/her district; only that they live within the state.

That said, living outside one’s district isn’t very wise from a political sense. Not being eligable to vote for oneself emphasizes the problem.


34 posted on 04/18/2017 4:21:39 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina ("The power to tax is the power to destroy." -- Chief Justice John Marshall, 1819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1

I had heard earlier that he does not have to reside in the district.


51 posted on 04/18/2017 4:43:27 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1
He states he has plans to move back to this district (just another month or two) when his girlfriend finishes school.

What if she, the newly qualified doctor, can't get a job she likes in his district and wants to go elsewhere? Will he dump her? Will she dump him? Will he follow her to wherever she decides to go? He's 30 years old and has been dating her for 12 years. Sounds like Pajama Boy to me.

75 posted on 04/18/2017 4:53:48 PM PDT by American Quilter (Let's see those vetting processes, and the proposed tax cuts, and the wall plans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1
If O wins they get what they asked for...


148 posted on 04/18/2017 5:33:35 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1
It’s no longer something that kills your political chances to be living with a woman outside marriage.

Resume enhancer if you have a "D" after your name (remember how Bubba's approval ratings went UP when being imepached). If a "R" is caught in immoral activity - and shacking up is immoral - then he/she must quit or resign.
162 posted on 04/18/2017 5:45:27 PM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1

Need to watch carefully. They’ll be fine-tuning their election stealing process, using what they learned after Shrillery, on the smaller elections.


403 posted on 04/18/2017 7:08:29 PM PDT by Melian (America, bless God. God, bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson