Skip to comments.
Supreme Court won't hear case challenging government's expedited removal of undocumented immigrants
CNN ^
| 4/17/2017
| Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter
Posted on 04/17/2017 3:24:46 PM PDT by mdittmar
(CNN)The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a lower court opinion rejecting claims by undocumented Central American women and children -- who were apprehended immediately after arriving in the country without authorization -- seeking asylum.
Lawyers for the families sought to challenge their expedited removal proceedings in federal court arguing they face gender-based violence at home, but a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court held that they have no right to judicial review of such claims.
The court's action means the government can continue to deny asylum seekers placed in expedited removal a chance to have their cases heard by federal court.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: Nifster
There are such things as beating strategic retreats. On both sides. When the time is ripe for an issue, it is looked at.
41
posted on
04/17/2017 5:57:58 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
“If he negotiates a modification in the law, the hard liners will not be pleased.”
Well, depending on what the “modification” is, I might be one of those who is not pleased. Maybe insisting on current laws being enforced is being a “hard liner”; if so, I’ll wear that label proudly.
42
posted on
04/17/2017 6:34:28 PM PDT
by
SharpRightTurn
(Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
That too. But nit getting four votes for review is a good thing
43
posted on
04/17/2017 7:04:33 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: oldplayer
44
posted on
04/17/2017 7:06:15 PM PDT
by
Pelham
(Liberate California. Deport Mexico Now)
To: mdittmar
45
posted on
04/17/2017 7:11:20 PM PDT
by
anton
To: mdittmar
"they face gender-based violence at home"That means their husbands/boyfriends beat them. That will all magically disappear if they come to the USA and get on welfare, right?
46
posted on
04/17/2017 7:15:23 PM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: eyeamok
And this is exactly why President Trump should have told the rogue Judges to go Pound Sand and COngress should have immediately IMPEACHED those rogue Judges for even Hearing those Cases on his Executive Order.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is Trump who would be impeached if he did not obey the courts. Too many RINOs would join with all of the democrats.
47
posted on
04/17/2017 8:03:55 PM PDT
by
Joe Bfstplk
(A Irredeemable Deplorable Texan)
To: ronnie raygun
At one time THERE were third grade class teachers, who passed on to THEIR students proper grammar and spelling. THEY’RE all long since retired.
48
posted on
04/17/2017 8:12:00 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Make US Intelligence great again!)
To: hsmomx3
I think Mr. Gorsuch has been a great choice and I am sure the libs are reeling right now.I'm really not so sure of that. My gut tells me otherwise. Nonetheless, keep your fingers crossed.
49
posted on
04/17/2017 8:39:08 PM PDT
by
Concentrate
(ex-texan was right. And Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. ( Pizzagate, Podt)
To: Concentrate
I respect your opinion as I have only seen bits and pieces of information since I have not had much time to thoroughly read articles. Maybe I have been deceived and will have to pay closer attention before forming a quick opinion.
50
posted on
04/17/2017 10:18:51 PM PDT
by
hsmomx3
To: SanchoP
_There is a law that has been on the books forever that anything within 150 miles of the border is considered the border so the mojados can be photographed/fingerprinted and deported immediately”
Well then the Feds. should get busy on emptying out Los Angeles pronto.
51
posted on
04/18/2017 3:10:55 AM PDT
by
DAC21
To: AuntB; La Lydia; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; 2ndDivisionVet; Biggirl
The-Supreme-Court-hates-immigrants PING
:)
To: Tennessee Nana
53
posted on
04/18/2017 9:40:56 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: Magnum44; ronnie raygun
To: freedomlover
Misspelled Meme irony alert
To: hsmomx3
As of today, I think he’s been a good choice.
I think the death penalty is a good deterrent in many cases, rather than not facing it and with no witnesses alive to testify, which incentivizes criminals to kill.
56
posted on
04/21/2017 11:48:57 AM PDT
by
Concentrate
(ex-texan was right. And Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. ( Pizzagate, Podt)
To: Concentrate
Dead men/women tell no tales.
57
posted on
04/21/2017 11:50:22 AM PDT
by
Concentrate
(ex-texan was right. And Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. ( Pizzagate, Podt)
To: mdittmar
OMGosh, commonsense becoming more common?
58
posted on
04/21/2017 11:52:18 AM PDT
by
Chgogal
(I will NOT submit, therefore, Jihadists hate me.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson