Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

[[This is where he exposes himself to a counterclaim in any lawsuit. It’s called contributing to the harm that you claim someone else has caused.]]

Exactly- Sadly united will likely settle though- probably out of court- because they want to try to salvage their reputation even though they did nothing wrong- (Except bumping him so that one of their own employees could ride- that was beyond the pale really, but still not illegal)


43 posted on 04/13/2017 9:23:54 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434
From what I've read, one of the complicating factors here was that there were actually two different carriers involved. I believe the United flight and the four crew members worked for two different airlines (United and a regional carrier contracted to fly certain routes for United) ... which means United may have been obligated under a contract to fly those crew members even if they didn't want to.

When you think about it, it's a terrible business decision to bump four paying customers from a flight in order to fly four non-paying crew members. Based on that, I would assume that this was done under an arrangement that didn't leave United any flexibility.

48 posted on 04/13/2017 9:30:56 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson