Posted on 04/10/2017 7:25:45 AM PDT by C19fan
Lindsey Graham Is HOT for World War III: “I Think ISIS Should be Germany and Assad Should Be Japan” (VIDEO)
Jim Hoft Apr 10th, 2017 7:33 am 70 Comments
Lindsey Graham Is Hot for War
Those 59 Tomahawks got his juices flowing— Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) joined Chuck Todd on Meet the Press on Sunday to push World War III.
“I think ISIS should be Germany and Assad should be Japan like World War II analogies here. Accelerate the demise of ISIL, they’re a direct threat to the homeland, Assad’s not. But I’ve never been more encouraged by the Trump administration than I am today.”
Never mind the fact that Assad never attacked the US or that Assad and ISIS are enemies and not allies.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Acknowledging the fact that your enemy wants to kill you and take over your land to expand its empire is not idiocy. Just because you do not want to be at war with someone who has sworn to kill you, does not make them magically not want to kill you any more. In fact, it makes it easier for them
Ignoring and not acknowledging the fact that muslem jihad is on the march, has taken Europe with out a fight and is already entrenched in our country, is idiocy.
Meh, but whats in a name?
You can absolutely count on trouble when either Graham or McCain speak out....they always carry the drumbeat of war and destruction.....’followed’ by the demorats who love to use them as their mouthpiece to test the waters.
I find it kinda wierd this twinkee is so hot to start wars.
#############
Perhaps due to personal incompetence - ditto his master, ‘Ace’ McCain. McCain was manifestly, even flamboyantly incompetent and catastrophic in his military career, which was an expensive net loss to the nation. Graham had one task in his life of any significance, the impeachment of bent Willy Clinton. As abject failures where it mattered, the illusion of puissance and grandeur through warmongering may be an irresistible temptation to these old, soft, pallid, ugly, and mediocre apparatchiks, whose lives are mostly spent and with no accomplishments of merit.
You are wrong there. You just gotta have the 'want to".
Luciferians always want to see the world in flames.
###############
That is the bottom line.
How many should we kill?
Because is we don’t kill all of them (and probably even if we do) the ideology still lives on.
That’s 1.6 Billion people. You up for that?
And if so, how would it be done? They are not all in one place so the ‘nuke them’ theory would not work without several million non-Muslims being killed.
When are these two knuckleheads gonna suit up and lead the charge?
If you invite them in ... it’s not a war.
I’d be fine nuking both from orbit. No ground troops needed.
He was on Tucker Carlson, the other night, advocating for 1700 more ground troops in Syria. He and his butt buddy definitely want war.
Exactly.
Makes no sense at all.
You cannot target just Muslims with a nuclear attack.
Why do people keep talking to this guy? There are 100 senators and we hear from a couple of them.
McCain: “I know ISIS intimately, I’ve met them and I talk to them all the time.”
Sounds like these two are TRYING to start WW3. In more civilized times they would be shot, or at the very least thrown in prison.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgLj5s0Xk8A
Yes, that is what many think.
Too bad the other side doesnt think that way. They rejoice and celebrate that we have made it so easy to be infiltrated and defeated.
Germany and Japan weren’t fighting each other, Linda...
If these two would volunteer to be in the front line, I might consider it, only to get rid of them.
Totally do not understand what our govt is doing with all of islamostan right now. We appear to have no philosophical basis or master plan.
The plan can be explained in one sentence. Increase war expenditures to increase profits.
As long as you and McIsane don’t have to put your behinds in harms way you are perfectly fine for WWIII taking place. I wouldn’t want my sons to serve in any of your warmongering lunacies Linda! An air strike is an air strike, just like Reagan hit Libya in 86, doesn’t mean we are sending in ground forces and calling up reserves.
This strike was for world consumption more than actually punishing Syria. The Syrian civil war only concerns us if we let it. Syria using or losing WMD’s is a concern because the pedophile worshiping goat humpers will use them if they obtain them.
Linda, take John, go off to the mountains, leave John’s wife at home and you two work out your aggression issues together as a couple.
How many of his major contributors are weapon manufacturers? How much does he have invested in weapons manufacturing? These things need to be investigated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.