Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Some of the Liberals are happy about this and that is a bad sign.
1 posted on 04/07/2017 3:39:16 AM PDT by bogusname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: bogusname

The world is now on notice-the gutless punk is no longer in the Oval Office. Trump said Syria crossed the line. 24 hours later they paid the price.


2 posted on 04/07/2017 3:42:27 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Charlie, here comes the deuce, and when you speak of me speak well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

From what I have seen, they’re still trying to figure out how they can spin this into a Trump failure.


3 posted on 04/07/2017 3:43:56 AM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

Doesn’t look like much that a few guys with spackle, shovels, and brooms can’t fix. Those jets seem to be unharmed.


4 posted on 04/07/2017 3:44:47 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

The armchair generals here don’t have all the facts. I trust that Trump made the decision based on the facts and intelligence that was available to him.


5 posted on 04/07/2017 3:46:14 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

All I have seen is some holes in the runways that can be patched up in a few days.


6 posted on 04/07/2017 3:48:00 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

I suspect (or hope) the video is selected to minimize the damage done. The runway “craters” shown are pretty small and they seem to have missed the planes in the concrete shelters.

Maybe the limited damage was intentional?


7 posted on 04/07/2017 3:48:25 AM PDT by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

Seems like a lot of noise over some dented pavement. Were we throwing squibs at them?


8 posted on 04/07/2017 3:49:02 AM PDT by Ol' Sox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname
The video does not show strength.

I suspect the enemies of America are thinking along those lines.

13 posted on 04/07/2017 3:55:40 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

Looks like they didn’t use bunker busters on the hardened hangers


16 posted on 04/07/2017 4:00:40 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

They were probably the chem weapons their Russian pals snuck in from Iraq via that large convoy prior to the gulf war.


19 posted on 04/07/2017 4:02:20 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary: The REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

Video is pure spin to minimize the attack. You’re telling me that video showed the results of 40 to 50 Tomahawk Cruise Missile strikes? hahahahahaha. Looks like they might have filmed a few areas where the shrapnel landed.


29 posted on 04/07/2017 4:11:34 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

The comments here are retarded. A RUSSIAN video shows one apparently intact aircraft, and the conclusion is that 59 1000 pound high explosive warheads did nothing.

Retarded!


32 posted on 04/07/2017 4:14:51 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname
50+ missiles @ $1M+ and THAT'S all we get??? embarrassing...

dint even go through the revetments

37 posted on 04/07/2017 4:18:24 AM PDT by Chode (My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America-#45 DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

Video shows little which is expected since it’s a Russian video.


41 posted on 04/07/2017 4:24:11 AM PDT by maddog55 (America Rising)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

I hope we did more damage than the tomahawks cost.


56 posted on 04/07/2017 4:53:06 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

“Some of the Liberals are happy about this and that is a bad sign.”

That narrative is an epic fallacy. Just because Pelosi & Schumer support a military action doesn’t make the action unwise or unwarranted.

Lot’s of FUD being spewed this morning regarding this attack. Never-trumpers thought there was blood in the water for them to feed on. Instead they are just drowning in their own idiocy, IMO.


65 posted on 04/07/2017 5:12:49 AM PDT by TheStickman (And their fear tastes like sunshine puked up by unicorns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

While another video shows massive damage, if you think a tomahawk just shows a black smudge on the pavement you will believe anything.


67 posted on 04/07/2017 5:13:37 AM PDT by dila813 (Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

The camera shots are narrow in their focus. This is to mask or minimize the damage. The Russians will both exaggerate the provocation and minimize the damage.

As to the damages: The runways can be repaired and the vintage warcraft are not much more expensive than the cruise missiles are.

Typically we spend $100 million to cause several millions in damages or less. The other side, through IEDs and such, spends hundreds of dollars to achieve enormous consequences in terms of terror. The mathematics of a war of attrition aren’t favorable.

BTW The concrete and dirt bunkers look relatively inexpensive and robust.

Arial bombing has its limitations. As for the signal being sent, we can’t yet say whether it is pinpricks (that set us back more than they cost them), or whether the other side now recognizes that there’s a new sherif in town. On the other hand, making Syria or a part of it into a no-fly zone can turn the tide on the ground. We could use Syria to field test our F-22s and F-35s.


68 posted on 04/07/2017 5:15:24 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsBchlbdJdc

video of Amir Tsarfati saying Israeli intelligence is positive it was Assad behind attacks.


74 posted on 04/07/2017 6:33:05 AM PDT by txgirl4Bush (Impeach obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bogusname

“Some of the Liberals are happy about this and that is a bad sign.”

*

I doubt that those happy liberals have the same intelligence that President Trump has.

And the opinions of happy liberals are generally unsubstantial.


76 posted on 04/07/2017 6:41:25 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum (Never Forget the Seals of Extortion 17 - and God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson