Rand Paul Wants Susan Rice Before Congress (Here it comes)

Breitbart ^ | Ian Mason

[little jeremiah]

And the MSM is irrelevant and around 30% of Americans at most believe it.

[Bobalu]

[Enchante]

“Did President Obama know you were doing this” is also a key question. Loyal political hatchet men like Susan Rice are perfectly capable of doing what the boss wants done without being ordered.

[Enchante]

“What did the president know and when did he know it” once again becomes an important question in a political scandal.

[MarvinStinson]

Good point.

[stanne]

I don’t know...Trump just pulled all US funding from UN overseas abortion and birth control. I’m sure a lot of people are running around saying “that’s not done. He can’t do that.”

[stanne]

There’s a recent photo of Diane feinstien and some old liberal senator looking at some paper or computer screen. Horrified. Wish I’d saved it. Like three week ago. It is ominous. I

[hoosiermama]

She won’t live that long ....

[Paul R.]

What's up with Congress sticking its nose into potentially criminal acts? What legislation does this impact? Hypothetical question, I know the answer. Congressional hearing are conducted for the benefit of individual congressweasels. It's for show.

IMO, there is quite a large role for Congress here: Not so much in seeking justice -- that's up to Sessions and his people.

However, while some areas seem fairly clear, there are multiple questions about the legalities of various aspects of all this. Some of these areas are discussed on other FR threads. It appears to me that Congress needs to write some very clear legislation with real teeth in it, to better protect our liberties.

[Candor7]

“She needs to be asked, ‘did President Obama ask her to do this?’ I think she ought to testify under oath on this,” Paul opined. >>>>>>>>>

Which is why Obama is on the other side of the world in French Polynesia on a private island , beyond Congressional subpoena process. (Or better still, no one really knows where Obama is.)

Rice will be subpoenaed. Congress also now has enough to subpoena the entire upper echelon of the White House staff, including Valerie Jarret.

President Trump is indeed draining the swamp.He had dinner with Rand Paul a day ago.

[spokeshave]

There’s a recent photo of Diane feinstien and some old liberal senator looking at some paper or computer screen. Horrified.

would this do...Feinstein and Leaky

[spokeshave]

After reviewing the secret documents...Feinstein looks "Mortified"

[spokeshave]

Feinstein and Grassley looking terrified after reviewing the secret docs:

[spokeshave]

Senators Feinstein and Grassley emerged from a closed door meeting with FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday looking like they’d seen a ghost. The two top members of the Senate Intelligence Committee looked visibly shaken and refused to answer any questions from the reporters assembled in the capitol.

[VideoDoctor]

Nah. NOTHING will happen. Repeat: NOTHING will happen.

I believe you'll find yourself "wrong" on that.

BOTH Trump and Sessions know that someone must be nailed to the cross as a grim reminder to future offenders.

My point: If you're a REAL gunslinger you have to shoot someone in order to create believers.. otherwise you're just another minor character passin' through.

[Candor7]

Which means that Trump and his team were “reversed targeted” by spooks who used foreigners as primary targets so they could backdoor access Trump and his team.

The spook term is “reverse targeting.”>>>>>>>>>>>>

So Judge Napolitano was correct? The Brits were involved?

[stanne]

It’s that third one the last photo.

[StAnDeliver]

The key to this, as Rand Paul knows, is finding where and how often Rice (cough, Obama) went out of bounds by unmasking regular people who don't know a white Russian from a black Russian: like Joe SixPack, Nancy R. Churchgoer, etc.

You get enough regular people and then have Breitbart interview them for wtf responses, you've got a narrative to demand Obama testify.

And then Rand gets to say this to Bobo's face:

"You've done enough sir, at long last, have you left no sense of decency?"

[Cboldt]

-- It appears to me that Congress needs to write some very clear legislation with real teeth in it, to better protect our liberties. --

Any "teeth" in the law requires a prosecutor with the will to enforce it. FISA and its predecessors have been debated ad nauseum.

As for the questions about legality, all of that is context dependent. The debate right now is in a fact vacuum, not a law vacuum.

Somehow we've gotten to a point where Congressional hearings substitute for enforcing the law, when it comes to big shots.

[Avalon Memories]

Seriously, what good would it do. She would lie or refuse to answer questions. The media and Democrats would cover for her and Obama. It would just be another wasted political circus.