Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dforest

But, latest lib spin is that “unmasking” is ok, even legal.


6 posted on 04/03/2017 4:19:33 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: LS

It’s gone from Trump lied it didn’t happen know it’s Trump was right but it’s legal


9 posted on 04/03/2017 4:23:09 PM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS

People like Hannity and Laura Ingraham have been giving that guy Eli Lake from Bloomberg all kinds of time today.

I listened to him twice. I believe he wrote the piece to make it all look legal and appropriate to unmask people. His push was if people do not like it, they need to fix the law.

I think he is full of hogwash and I wish they would ignore this guy.


14 posted on 04/03/2017 4:39:37 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS; Liz

My question is where does Comey fit, in this? He just remarked in the most recent hearing that there was no evidence Trump’s tweet was true, that he was “wire tapped”, by Obama.

Did he not know Trump phone calls to Australia and some other country we’re captured and said to be on transcripts? The details of the conversations were quoted in the NYT.

Comey does not seem to know about, or have to answer for what is going on against Trump, or is possibly a part of it.

I can not forget that this boob let Hillary skate on emails and on sharing classified information, on the NON-EXISTENT standard for justification of treasonous acts... Motivation.

Comey will say Susan Rice had no “malicious” motivation. With Comey the new standard will be “malicious” motivation. Just watch.


19 posted on 04/03/2017 5:02:52 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Acad emi are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS
You know what their first defense is going to be, right?

Susan Rice had authorization to unmask these names, so how can it be "illegal" for her to do so? Some reason other than in-the-normal-course-of-NSA-business reason would have to be tied to her and proven and then there is the issue of intent and well....I know where this is going. No where.

Even if she did this for Obama, it would be hard to prove the names were unmasked for political purposes. Maybe there is direct evidence that is strong and compelling and shows a pattern that can be proven in court? Doesn't sound like they would leave such a trail that is so obvious.

Everybody smells blood in the water but I think this will turn into a drawn-out quagmire.

36 posted on 04/03/2017 6:32:38 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Not without a warrant, Larry. Or else why even go through the trouble of having a FISA court? And didn’t the FISA court turn DOWN the warrant on Trump last June? If so this reeks of deliberate end run around the law.

The whole thing is lawlessness on display.


40 posted on 04/03/2017 6:54:11 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson