Posted on 04/03/2017 8:29:36 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
As a long-time news analyst, I find it refreshing that at least some professors are taking the rise of conservative journalism seriously and treating it as a subject to be studied. In a "Call for Book Chapters on Conservative News," professors Anthony M. Nadler and A.J. Bauer are calling on academics and others to contribute essays on the growth and influence of conservative news and opinion outlets.
"Conservative news has become a tremendously powerful platform in the United States, wielding a vast influence on the terms of political discourse," they note.
Nadler is an Assistant Professor of Media and Communication Studies at Ursinus College and is the author of Making the News Popular: Mobilizing U.S. News Audiences (2016, University of Illinois Press). Bauer is a Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellow and Doctoral Candidate in the Department of Social & Cultural Analysis at New York University.
It may be the case that liberal academia is looking for an antidote to the success of conservative news and information. But the success of shows like Sean Hannity's are something to be studied, not mocked as "bad for America."
"Crucially," notes Bauer, "reported trust in major news media in the U.S. differs greatly along partisan lines." This reflects the fact that conservative Americans have rejected the liberal media, and have looked for and found alternatives.
In his preliminary draft for the full project proposal, Bauer writes, "While it is obvious that conservative news cultures have been powerful and among the forces shaping the circulation and norms of political discourse, critical media studies has largely let the story of conservative news slip past its view."
In other words, the liberals in the media and academia did not see this coming. They didn’t understand the powerful forces of conservative media as a reaction to the liberal media monopoly that is now in the process of disintegrating.
Ted Koppel is in a position to understand and study this phenomenon. Instead, Koppel highlights a "polarized America." He had a chance to understand the phenomenon of conservative news and opinion, but decided instead to attack it.
It’s "bad for America" when liberals in the media abandon the debate and try to smear their opponents. We didn’t expect this from Koppel.
Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism, and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org
With the leftist lock on academia, I'm sure they think we're now harmless enough to "study."
"Hmm! Conservatives! Such curious creatures! I marvel that they should think and write the way they do. I wonder why? Perhaps these treatises of arcane knowledge by Gramschi and Alinsky can supply me with the answers without having to actually interact with one."
Spot on. The liberal in any form always schemes, never gives up and very rarely will ever change hi/her/its ways of thinking. For many it's power and fortune and for most it's just plain generational brainwashing.
“Actually the proper term is Communists.”
True, but they’ll never accept it, and neither will those watching from the sidelines.
It’s curious how people can blot out words that define them perfectly if those labels don’t flatter. “Leftist” puts them within an historical context; if they ask what you mean you can tell them to read up on the French Revolution.
Who knows, maybe they will.
If they won’t we must. We need to brand them with that moniker as it still carries a stigma. Liberal or even socialist absolves them of the stigma as even Marx said socialist was just a polite name for communist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.