Try reading this before commenting further...
Clinton 3 Points Ahead of Trump in Final Bloomberg National Poll
My point is, reading Bloomberg doesn't mean you have "proof". They don't have proof either. The author makes a statement and then proceeds to say it is "according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter". But he doesn't name names. He said, they said.
I read the media reports daily on this stuff. That is exactly why I am skeptical. Most of what I read is not based in fact but on unsourced leaks, anonymous sources, unconfirmed well-placed officials, innuendo, gossip and outright faked news articles. I don't trust the media at all.
I'll reiterate, I want to see someone arrested, indicted and convicted of these crimes before I will get my hopes up. I don't know of one case so far during the whole Obama regime or during this whole presidential campaign and election, that's ended up with someone being held legally responsible and accountable for what people on FR call "obvious" crimes. None.
With those kind of odds, I still say this will eventually will go away and Rice will not be held legally accountable.
Comprehension must not be your strength when reading...
1) ONLY THE NSA is able to unmask US citizens swept up in surveillance
2) Susan Rice (per computer logs) accessed information specific to Trump and his associates AND PERSONALLY REQUESTED the unmasking of these specific surveillances
And how did this become known? Because Trump requested an internal review of how unmasking of US citizens can be done in order to find the source of the leaks which the FBI was unwilling/unable to do.