To: Enlightened1
2 posted on
03/31/2017 5:06:03 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Enlightened1
It wouldn’t surprise me if muzzie Brennen was hacking on behalf of obama. Obama and Hillary really don’t like each other. Obama only gave the appearance of supporting Hillary.
Obama and his goons (like Brennan) spied on Hillary and Trump.
Hillary lost because of obama. She was unable to critize anything that obama did because he had the goods on her that could have brought her down at any time. He could have at any time derailed her campaign. Hillary couldn’t even critize the lame economy under obama. She had to steer clear of any issues that were critical of obama.
Obama had his muzzie pal spying on Trump, Hillary, Merkel, the Japanese, and so many others except for our greatest threats ..... their Muslim pals.
4 posted on
03/31/2017 5:13:49 AM PDT by
boycott
To: Enlightened1
Why would Russia not want Hillary to win?
Pray America woke
5 posted on
03/31/2017 5:37:08 AM PDT by
bray
(Pray for President Trump)
To: Enlightened1
Just shared on Facebook. Globalist Traitors everywhere! Pray for President Trump.
7 posted on
03/31/2017 5:58:13 AM PDT by
cowboyusa
To: Enlightened1
Can some one explain to me how Russia tried to subvert the 2016 election?
9 posted on
03/31/2017 6:03:35 AM PDT by
Chgogal
(I will NOT submit, therefore, Jihadists hate me.)
To: Enlightened1
It begs the question of whether or not what the private security firm identified as “Russian” signatures in the DNC hacking was actually CIA hacking made to look as if it was from a Russian source - Obama spying on the DNC and Billary, Inc.
10 posted on
03/31/2017 6:07:16 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: Enlightened1
Maybe the CIA's too unethical for their own good. Maybe being unethical - and getting away with it - is part of the reason the world's NOT done much to solve their problems. The more we know - the less impressed we are... Shine some sunlight on them...
11 posted on
03/31/2017 8:29:05 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Democrats lost because Hillary was so unpopular a dead dog could have beaten her. Roger Daltrey)
To: Enlightened1
Just wondering? Is it possible there might be a white hat that has done some of the (fake Russian)hacking and feeding it to WikiLeaks?
Maybe that is where Anonymous and WikiLeaks got their info on the DNC and Podesta?
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the white hats have a mole in the shadow government....
12 posted on
03/31/2017 8:46:43 AM PDT by
Ms Mable
To: Enlightened1
You can't trust the government about anything. They lie habitually. Even when the truth will suffice, they will lie just out of habit.
I'd just as soon trust a random biker dude, as anyone from the FBI, NSA, CIA, DEA, or BATF.
13 posted on
03/31/2017 9:35:58 AM PDT by
zeugma
(The Brownshirts have taken over American Universities.)
To: Enlightened1
"CIA went to great lengths to disguise its own hacking attacks and point the finger at Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.
Did Google and/or Crowdstrike have contracts with the CIA?
Was Crowdstrike made aware of this CIA capability either directly or illegally?
Did Crowdstrike in fact, plant a Russian signature through a false-flag Phishing scam against the DNC for possible later use against candidate Trump in the event that he won?
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the answer is 'Yes' to all three.
14 posted on
03/31/2017 10:22:47 AM PDT by
indthkr
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson