Skip to comments.
Connecticut considering weaponizing drones [Skynet!!]
AP/Fox 5 NY ^
| 3/30/17
| Dave Collins
Posted on 03/30/2017 7:19:32 PM PDT by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: markomalley
Just what we need....../s
2
posted on
03/30/2017 7:21:34 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: markomalley
Connecticut has decided to declare war on its citizens.
That cuts both ways.
3
posted on
03/30/2017 7:21:43 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(President Trump is coming, and the rule of law is coming with him.)
To: Lurkinanloomin; RushIsMyTeddyBear; metmom; CynicalBear; SkyPilot; tuffydoodle; tang-soo; ...
[ Connecticut lawmakers are considering whether the state should become the first in the country to allow police to use drones outfitted with deadly weapons ]
Oh, I like this idea. What could possibly go wrong?
4
posted on
03/30/2017 7:24:06 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
To: markomalley
Guess we all need shotguns.
5
posted on
03/30/2017 7:26:35 PM PDT
by
Reno89519
(Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
Just remember, still gotta have a Terminator flying that thing.
6
posted on
03/30/2017 7:26:36 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
To: markomalley
...and lasers. Maybe frequency jammer to disable them.
7
posted on
03/30/2017 7:27:54 PM PDT
by
Reno89519
(Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
To: Reno89519; dfwgator
A shotgun worked for Rowdy Roddy Piper.
8
posted on
03/30/2017 7:28:13 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
To: markomalley
You wouldn’t BELIEVE the progress they’re making with SWARMING.
They even have an abundantly feasible “SKY Aircraft Carrier” concept starting now —I’m sure it will take awhile BUT:
The smaller aircraft are called GREMLINS. They are transported to the general battle area by something similar to a C-130. They Gremlins are released and go in for SEAD-type missions, perform mapping, suppression etc. then return and land in the Mothership loitering safetly nearby.
If one or more Gremlins are attrited, who cares? They are designed with attrition in mind, off the shelf components, etc.
The swarms are so far not huge but those huge swarms will soon come.
It will be so that if the mothership succeeds in getting somewhat close and launching her swarm then mostly it’s GAME OVER for the enemy (in the future that’s more or less the citizenry, I’d wager).
9
posted on
03/30/2017 7:29:20 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: markomalley
The police in Dallas used C-4 on a robot to kill the sniper last year.
To: markomalley
It won’t be too much longer before the whole civilian drone industry gets legislated out of existence. It is way easier to make the drone be the deadly weapon than to figure out how to get it to carry a deadly weapon, and it will only take a few incidents to make this into a national panic
11
posted on
03/30/2017 7:42:31 PM PDT
by
jz638
To: gaijin
A person could bring down a plane with a swarm, could they not? get sucked into the intake.
12
posted on
03/30/2017 7:42:44 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I've wasted enough time eating mushrooms and conversing with hookah smoking caterpillars.)
To: markomalley
The polices are ALWAYS exempted from the restriction we peasants must tolerate.
And to ice it off, they get "qualified immunity" if they blow you away by mistake.
To: doorgunner69
I watch Chicago APB, so, of course, I must be an expert on these drones being weaponized.(/S)
14
posted on
03/30/2017 7:53:15 PM PDT
by
Mark
(Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? -Homer Simpson)
To: markomalley
The legislation is directly targetting law abiding gun owners: ban weaponizing drones except for police...
15
posted on
03/30/2017 7:58:25 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: markomalley
Not until they’re autonomous, which isn’t far away tech wise.
To: jz638
Police already using registered home cameras to spy on us, hence registered drones and them asking pervert drone peeping toms cooperation. This is why they want with the FAa to punish shooting drones down
17
posted on
03/30/2017 8:00:25 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: markomalley
Law-abiding citizens need “iron domes” for protection.
18
posted on
03/30/2017 8:04:40 PM PDT
by
Jyotishi
(Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Connecticut has decided to declare war on its citizens. That cuts both ways.
Do you suppose the sale of shot gun shells will proliferate, under that policy? 😀😆
19
posted on
03/30/2017 8:12:09 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(20 years a USAF Air Traffic Controller, RETIRED. A career that will make you old before your time)
To: Lurkinanloomin
If you outlaw weaponized drones, then only outlaws will have weaponized drones.
20
posted on
03/30/2017 8:14:21 PM PDT
by
AZLiberty
(A is now A once again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson