Those are simply wise decisions!
Jesus Christ: You can't impeach Him and He ain't gonna resign.
She must be very insecure
[[Feminazis on Twitter Erupt Over Pence Marriage]]
The fact that they are ‘outraged’ that a man loves his wife and values her enough to keep from even appearing immoral tells you everything you need to know about the NASTY feminists
Feminists are despicable
Lefties hate Trump and Pence. They will find reasons to criticize them no matter what they do.
Interesting. My wife has been in Thailand for the last 6 months. About a month ago, I went out to dinner with 3 of her female friends. Reminded me of why I don’t go out to dinner, with my wife or anyone else, LOL.
Actually, it was fun. But when you are out, there’s nowhere to run and hide. At least when my wife entertained them at our house, I could escape to the garage or somewhere.
So he loves his wife and doesn’t want to give her any reason to doubt him.
What a jerk! /s
He sounds like a stand-up guy, IMO.
My coworker is half my age and we sometimes spend business days on the road. I enjoy her company and she enjoys mine however we know our boundaries. There’s just no way either of us are going to get romantically inclined crossing that boundary. She’s a gorgeous woman too but we aint going there. Who wants or needs the complications and headaches.
I am professional engineer, work in an environment in which 95% of my coworkers and clients are men. I am married. I absolutely do not go out to lunch, dinner or for drinks with only a single male colleague. In my younger years I suppose I was considered “hot” because I got hit on a lot. It was always very awkward and I finally got fed up for good. My “no lunches/dinners for two” policy with male colleagues has served me well for the last 25 plus years.
I think it’s fabulous that the FemiNazis are in a nasty Twitter uproar about Mike Pence’s happy marriage. The opposite of a feminist: a happily married woman.
The rules about accepting hospitality were strict.
Lunch with the branch manager.....OK. Dinner ....no way, unless invited to dine with his family.
Made sense.
And the left is completely mum about the sexual adventures of bill clinton, ted kennedy, etc. yet wants to lecture Christians on what Jesus would do. That’s why I don’t care at all what liberals think.......they are hypocrites that fake outrage.
I was wondering why anyone would care. This very normally is a courtesy to a man’s wife that quite naturally would not want her husband fleeting about with other women. I started to read this article and quit halfway through and if anything I didn’t read was worth reading I apologies to the author. However I guess the size of the complaint is that some women exercising their Freudian enviable nature would desire to be men in as many respects as they possibly can and want men to actually treat them no different than he would treat he.
“Social-science research shows this practice extends beyond politics and into the business world, and it can hold women back from key advancement opportunities. A 2010 Harvard Business Review research report led by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, the president of the Center for Work-Life Policy think tank, found that many men avoid being sponsors—workplace advocates—for women “because sponsorship
can be misconstrued as sexual interest.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/03/pences-gender-segregated-dinners/521286/
Of course at the bottom of all of this is what effect it might have on marriages in general or even in future of marrage surviving. and according to Gallup there is a dim glimmer of hope.
“One might think that the institution of marriage is becoming outdated. Statistics show that half of all marriages that occur today will end in divorce, and more people are choosing to live together as partners or delay marriage. But, marriage must have its attractions, because most of those who have failed at it once try again.”
“And now gay couples are clamoring for their right to enter into matrimony.”
http://www.gallup.com/poll/11161/divorce-doesnt-last.aspx
when I was working it was standard practice for a male admin to have witness whenever a female was interviewed, all male Doctors have a nurse present when examining a female.....wonder why the need for a “witness”??
Perhaps It would be a good idea for Rush Limbsugh to stay away from this subject.
BTW, how does Limbsugh know there are 54 men with Obama in Tahiti?
The only problem I see with it is if he had to meet 1 on 1 with a female politician or female intelligence official or a female head of state of another country. What if they have to discuss top secret information?
Would he have to bring his wife along? What if she doesn’t have security clearance? Would he just not meet with the female person to discuss classified/top secret matters?
This is similar to, but not exactly like, some Muslim men who refuse to shake a woman’s hand in a Western setting. The same premise behind it at least ... temptation. So it’s considered backward.
OK he doesn’t have to go out to dinner alone with a woman but he might have to meet behind closed doors with a woman for official business. Some very Christian men will not do that. That might be a problem in the situations I described above.
Is that what he said, or does he just not eat alone with another woman? I can't imagine he never eats even with a group without his wife there.
dunno why feminazis would be’pissd.
soumdslike much more of a drag for him than his wife. feminazis should be overjoyed he cant do normal acceptable fun things without wifey right there watching.
Those are simply wise decisions!
Jesus Christ: You can't impeach Him and He ain't gonna resign.
Let us thank the Lord for Mike Pence, who appears to be a wise and steady hand at President Trump’s side.
At the end of the day, the feminazis don’t care about women. They, like all the other pet groups, just want to ensure that everyone is in agreement with the delusions of evil.
Together they have become corrupt. So think, ‘consensus’.