Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?
Zerohedge.com ^ | 3/29/17 | The_Real_Fly

Posted on 03/30/2017 10:04:06 AM PDT by blueyon

This was making waves yesterday, after Evelyn Farkas admitted to Mika from The Morning Joe show that she strongly advised people 'on the hill' and in our intelligence agencies to tuck away intelligence regarding Russo-Trump ties for the sake of preservation, in an effort to protect it from the onerous bureaucracy she obviously finds to be deplorable.

"Get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration," said Farkas in an interview yesterday on MSNBC.

She was afraid the Trump people would gain access to their intelligence and whisk it away -- because they're all Russian spies, obviously. Aside from what appears to be a brazen confirmation of spying on the Trump team, the bigger red flag here is Dr. Farkas wasn't employed by the Obama administration at the time the Russian allegations arose.

According to Pentagon records, Dr. Farkas resigned in September of 2015.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: clinton; evelynfarkas; farkas; govtabuse; hillaryclinton; mediabias; obama; potus; russia; spying; trump; trumprussia; trumpwiretaps; wiretapped
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Hmmmm resigned in Sept of 2015......so how does she know what was happening?
1 posted on 03/30/2017 10:04:06 AM PDT by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I think she was on Hillary’s campaign - if yes - Hillary was in the loop getting the intel on the Trump team found by the surveilliance.


2 posted on 03/30/2017 10:07:28 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Doncha know? She was on the distrib list too. Anybody who NEEDED to know in order to ‘save the country’ - I mean, of course, ‘preserve their agenda.’ Ends justify any means/ so disgusting.


3 posted on 03/30/2017 10:07:44 AM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Maybe they were doing surveillance prior to 9-2015? Obama’s huge campaign database must always be hungry for input.


4 posted on 03/30/2017 10:08:01 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Because Donald Trump started to run in June 2015, and the Obama administration started “wiretapping” him then?????


5 posted on 03/30/2017 10:08:45 AM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

They are going to have to get this woman into a psychiatric hospital ASAP in order to discredit her, and discredit here they damn well better do, because her testimony isn’t just a smoking gun, it’s a gun with a red-glowing barrel.


6 posted on 03/30/2017 10:08:57 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I hope my 401k is not invested in Ms. Farkas’ life insurance company.


7 posted on 03/30/2017 10:12:48 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

This Evelyn Farkas story blew up yesterday, March 29. Yet, apparently the video was aired live way back on March 2. Can anyone explain how it did not become news until 4 weeks later? Was it really because it aired on Morning Joe/MSNBC where no conservatives who would notice the issues are watching?

None of the stories about this that I have read explain the delay in the video finally hitting the headlines yesterday.


8 posted on 03/30/2017 10:13:24 AM PDT by leftcoaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

If the NSA or the Russians would publicly share Hillary’s deleted 30,000 emails, perhaps we would find Farkas among Hillary’s email buddies.


9 posted on 03/30/2017 10:13:45 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Hmmmm resigned in Sept of 2015......so how does she know what was happening?

Surely she made friends at DOD while she worked there, and since she remained in the beltway after then in thinktanks and in the political world, she likely stayed in touch with folks within the Obama admin.

This means Obama's people broke laws in telling her things... and she was probably one of many semi-outsiders they fed leaked stuff to to try and derail Trump's election efforts.

10 posted on 03/30/2017 10:14:32 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Obama held “Secret Surveillance Summits.”

“Democrats on the Hill” arrived in droves after they heard Obama planned to serve refreshments.

Hillary’s team arrived wearing their “I’m with Her” buttons.

A good time was had by all....James Comey told a few jokes.

And they got to listen-in to Trumps phone conversations after Michelle and Obama did a karaoke number to Sinatra singling “I Did It My Way.”


11 posted on 03/30/2017 10:14:58 AM PDT by Liz ( w W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Ping.


12 posted on 03/30/2017 10:15:42 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

She kept referring to people on the hill. Did she mean she was transferring this intel to democrats in Congress? Including McCain, of course.


13 posted on 03/30/2017 10:17:51 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

“Because Donald Trump started to run in June 2015, and the Obama administration started “wiretapping” him then?????”

But she would have NO access to it after she resigned..............unless something really dirty is going on


14 posted on 03/30/2017 10:18:09 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: leftcoaster

It didn’t become news right away because the whole focus was on the “Trump-Russia” collaboration story. That didn’t get superseded by the “Obama wiretapped Trump” story until a few days later when Trump started his Twitter storm. It wasn’t considered newsworthy at the time because the implications of what she said weren’t immediately clear.


15 posted on 03/30/2017 10:18:49 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

That’s easy. She worked for Hillary. Obama made sure Hillary had all she needed.


16 posted on 03/30/2017 10:19:45 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

DUH! She was part of the Hillary campaign, so she had access to anything that the IC provided to the Hillary campaign.


17 posted on 03/30/2017 10:22:14 AM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Obama’s “John Dean” could only come forward this way: a bureaucrat with a brain enfeebled by too much time in an echo-chamber.


18 posted on 03/30/2017 10:22:15 AM PDT by BillyBonebrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

“...part of Hillary’s campaign...”

See my #2 as well.


19 posted on 03/30/2017 10:25:34 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
This is the first revelation on FR as far as I can tell:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3538768/posts

A brand new FR account posted it.

I noticed it right away and was actually the first to comment. I originally thought it was fishy but not any more, of course.

20 posted on 03/30/2017 10:26:36 AM PDT by bankwalker (groupthink is dangerous ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson