Posted on 03/27/2017 5:33:51 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
This just in from O'Reilly. Nunes is on right now and, shockingly, it seems Comey and Rogers refused to show up.
I just posted this, hoping someone can straighten out the “Sessions committed treason” accusation. I don’t like letting it stand, but I can’t figure out the Iran deal voting thing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3538896/posts?page=1
My $0.02 worth.
This Fish guy is a noob (Since Apr 22, 2016) with a blog. When he is asked to explain what he means his response instructs us to go to his blog and read the PDF. Seems that it would be less ‘suspicious’ if he were to explain himself and/or copy/paste the relevant passages from this PDF he wants hits to his blog for.
Since he is seemingly incapable of doing so, his accusatory blathering gets relegated to the ‘when I get a round tuit’ department. I may or may not get the round tuit when I finish two projects here of more personal importance. This Fish person has not offered any evidence (other than his accusation which is dubious) that would increase the believe-ability of his accusation and compel me to give his blog a hit.
If it has anything to do with OB’s Iran nuke ‘treaty’ keep in mind that Obiewan-the-imposter never submitted that treaty to the Senate for ratification as the Constitution requires..
Normally if I wasn’t up to my eyeballs in draining a swamp here (it’s an electronic one but has turned into a swamp nonetheless) I would have already checked his posting history to see what type of nutbag he might possibly be but right now that is not going to happen for a while.
But I will keep checking in to see if anything gets clarified.
He’s a retread.
I've never said I didn't have a previous s/n, and I won't — there's zero reason to lie. (And it's such a stupid thing to lie about.)
(I made the new s/n for my blog, and I've been completely honest about this.)
Perhaps the only thing I would dispute about being called a retread
is the underlying/unspoken implication/subtext that I'm a troll/plant/Democrat/Liberal/Shill/whatever.
I believe I said, “posting this just in case he tries saying he isn’t.”
Now point out to me in there where it says that you denied it?
This is a test of your comprehension.
Try not to fail.
Second point: what your prior handle was says quite alot about whether you have any credibility.
Yes, retreading often is an attempt to hide a damaged image.
A high-ranking official from Turkey’s second-largest state-owned bank was arrested in New York City March 27.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.