Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Devin Nunes' meeting with source at White House raises Trump inquiry fears
theguardian.com ^ | Spencer Ackerman in New York and Ben Jacobs in Washington

Posted on 03/27/2017 12:42:28 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

The embattled House intelligence committee chairman, Devin Nunes, has said he had no choice under classification rules except to view sensitive documents at the White House, a statement likely to intensify speculation that the Trump administration fed Nunes the material.

*snip*

Nunes has dodged questions, primarily from CNN, that his source came from the White House, and intimated that whistleblowers from the intelligence agencies brought the surveillance documents to him. Nunes told Bloomberg View on Monday that his source was an intelligence official and not a White House staffer.

But Nunes’ office has acknowledged that the chairman viewed whatever surveillance documents he has acquired on the White House grounds, apparently at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, where the National Security Council staff works.

Viewing the documents at the White House came under immediate scrutiny, since the House committee possesses secure facilities where it frequently accesses classified information as part of its routine responsibilities.

But Jack Langer, Nunes’ spokesman, told the Guardian that Nunes saw at the White House “executive branch documents” that Congress does not have.

“Because of classification rules, the source could not simply put the documents in a backpack and walk them over to the House intelligence committee space. The White House grounds was the best location to safeguard the proper chain of custody and classification of these documents, so the chairman could view them in a legal way,” Langer said.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: intelligence; nunes; nunespresser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2017 12:42:28 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Excuse me .. Nunes is not obligated to tell anybody ANYTHING.


2 posted on 03/27/2017 12:43:54 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Nunes saw at the White House “executive branch documents” that Congress does not have.

Oh, boy.

3 posted on 03/27/2017 12:44:04 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Fake News.

Nunes had an obligation to inform the Commander In Chief
of wiretapping and spying.


4 posted on 03/27/2017 12:44:22 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
But Jack Langer, Nunes’ spokesman, told the Guardian that Nunes saw at the White House "executive branch documents" that Congress does not have.

I have a suspicion that these "executive branch documents" did not originate in the executive branch, either.

5 posted on 03/27/2017 12:44:30 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“The embattled House intelligence committee chairman, Devin Nunes”

No slant in this article. None what so ever. NOT!


6 posted on 03/27/2017 12:44:42 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; onyx; Jane Long; V K Lee; RitaOK; Black Agnes; PennsylvaniaMom; Fai Mao; Fiddlstix; ...

Some good, new intel in here...ping.


7 posted on 03/27/2017 12:46:08 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Y’know, I wonder if these documents were dropped off by Comey during his sudden visit last Friday? Nah!


8 posted on 03/27/2017 12:49:55 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Liz; Jane Long

More information


9 posted on 03/27/2017 12:53:39 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Hmmm.


10 posted on 03/27/2017 12:53:46 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux; Cap Huff

Holy shit.


11 posted on 03/27/2017 12:55:22 PM PDT by Dog (..."I'm just a cook....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

If the head of the intelligence committee cannot brief the president on possible cyber crime, nothing do with Russia , then why would we have an intelligence committee?


12 posted on 03/27/2017 12:56:16 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Ping


13 posted on 03/27/2017 12:56:41 PM PDT by Cap Huff (1776 - Washington fought on our side. 2016 Washington fought against us . . . and lost!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; RoosterRedux

Well, otoh, Nunes is only privy to anything called evidence by virtue of his position on a Committee, as it’s chairman.


14 posted on 03/27/2017 12:57:05 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Contradicting testimony from the FBI and NSA directors, Trump claimed Nunes’ remarks provided a modicum of vindication for the president’s baseless claim that Obama placed Trump Tower under surveillance, something even Nunes continues to deny. Nunes has said the intelligence collection that “alarmed” him did not concern Russia.

Baseless? Ha! It's turning out to be even worse than many of us thought.

15 posted on 03/27/2017 12:57:38 PM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; null and void; KC_Lion; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; ...

16 posted on 03/27/2017 12:58:26 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

No...these were someones left behind documents.


17 posted on 03/27/2017 12:58:49 PM PDT by Dog (..."I'm just a cook....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff

Scroll up...lol


18 posted on 03/27/2017 12:59:36 PM PDT by Dog (..."I'm just a cook....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy; RitaOK; All

This Nunes meeting on White House grounds (probably at EEOB) occurred one day before he made his announcement on March 22. So the meeting on WH grounds occurred on Tuesday, March 21st.


19 posted on 03/27/2017 1:03:10 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seastay

He went to meet a source at a secure location. Secure as far as the source was also concerned. 1+1=2 Therefore the committee and its rooms are therefore not secure. Nor would I think it was secure if they had the smoking gun. Make sure those cannot get a head start impugning the information but rather Nunes can take the hit as the information will speak for itself. Nunes is playing this smart and safe. This is big.


20 posted on 03/27/2017 1:04:45 PM PDT by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson