Speaking of which, take a look at the Roberts threads from 2005. His appointment was applauded on here and numerous people said his personal views meant absolutely nothing because his "judicial philosophy" was "originalist" and that would magically ensure he always votes the right way.
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
I can’t remember if Roberts had anything widely known that is eyebrow raising like the church this guy attends and is involved with, at least before he was confirmed. Did he?
I think probably this guy gets confirmed, so we will see eventually. You can always ping this thread if he turns out to be a stiff. Heck, you should probably ping it if he turns out to be a good one too. We need more of that on the internet.
Freegards