Posted on 03/22/2017 6:42:50 AM PDT by rdl6989
Judge Neil Gorsuch repeatedly defended an “undocumented immigrant” against the massive crush of the administrative state during his confirmation hearing Tuesday, picking a fascinating fight with his potential future colleagues on the Supreme Court. The case he was referring to — a 2016 ruling from the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in which he wrote both the opinion of the court and, strikingly, a separate concurring opinion — has become a major flash point in his quest to win a seat on the Supreme Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
“Absolutely Settled Law”
That’s absolutely nonsense. There is no law, only an illicit diktat which is to be ignored.
Gloom, despair and agony on me... ;-/
That enough for me to think we need someone else right there.
I suspect we’re going to be calling this guy “Gor-suck” before too long. He’s a Souter/Kennedy clone.
..and they are indeed upset and angry
I work with a bunch of em...butthurt little crybabies.
when they hold their little daily crybaby sessions about whatever chapped their diaper from the night before, I calmly counter with facts, logic and reasoning.
they stopped inviting me to lunch......
perfect....
took me a second....but I got it..
If Laura Ingraham knows of more conservative contenders then why are we even wasting our time on this guy Gorsuch? Now is the time to double-down. We are talking about positioning a Justice of the US Supreme Court. This guy stinks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.