© Greg Nash
Posted on 03/21/2017 6:25:13 PM PDT by jazusamo
Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch maintained a polite demeanor during Tuesday’s marathon questioning by the Senate Judiciary Committee, sprinkling his responses with “golly” and “goodness” but refusing to answer questions on how he might rule from the bench.
Democrats repeatedly sought to get under Gorsuch’s skin, but President Trump’s nominee rarely appeared ruffled during his first day of questioning, and even seemed to charm senior Democrats at times.
He told ranking member Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) that he wished he could answer her questions more fully, and marveled at Sen. Patrick Leahy ’s (D-Vt.) creativity in framing his queries.
When Feinstein asked whether he would submit to the record examples of times he ruled against powerful interests and in favor of “the little guy,” Gorsuch replied, “Oh, goodness, I’ll name a bunch of them right now,” before catching himself and saying, “I’m sorry, senator. Of course.”
His polite demeanor seemed to win her over a little, and when he declined to speak about his personal views of the contrasting opinions in the landmark gun control case District of Columbia v. Heller, Feinstein relented.
“All right, I’ll let you off the hook,” she said.
Gorsuch’s performance seemed to take inspiration from the testimony Chief Justice John Roberts delivered to the committee after being nominated by President George W. Bush 11 years ago.
Roberts compared himself to a humble baseball umpire whose job is to “call balls and strikes,” not swing for the fences.
Gorsuch adopted a similar strategy Tuesday, repeatedly invoking the solemn duty to “apply the law impartially” that comes with a judge’s “honest black polyester” robe.
The stakes were higher in his second day before the committee, as it was the first opportunity senators had to question him in public.
Gorsuch’s sharpest retorts were prompted by Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Al Franken (D-Minn.), who showed impatience with his repeated refusals to speak to his personal views.
Whitehouse demanded to know whether Gorsuch knew who had helped fund a $10 million Judicial Crisis Network ad campaign supporting his nomination and pressed him on whether he had any knowledge of the activities of billionaire Phil Anschutz, who reportedly lobbied the administration to make the pick.
“I don’t know individuals who are contributing. I don’t know that,” Gorsuch said.
When Whitehouse asked why wealthy donors might spend so much to support him, Gorsuch said, “Ask them.”
“I can’t, because I don’t know who they are,” Whitehouse replied.
Whitehouse tried to pin the nominee down on the debate over the corrupting influence of money in politics, losing patience when Gorsuch dodged the question about his personal views by referring to a 1973 Supreme Court case on campaign finance regulations.
“I’m asking, actually, you,” Whitehouse said.
That seemed to get a rise out of the until-then unflappable Gorsuch.
“I’m giving you my answer the best I can, which is the First Amendment, which I’m sworn to uphold as a judge, contains two competing messages,” he replied.
Franken slammed Gorsuch’s dissent in a 10th U.S. Circuit Court decision that sided with a truck driver who disobeyed an employer’s order when he thought he was at risk of freezing to death as “absurd.”
“I have had a career identifying absurdity, and I know it when I see it,” the former “Saturday Night Live” star said. “It makes me question your judgment.”
Gorsuch appeared close to breaking from his cool demeanor when Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) questioned whether his originalist approach to the law would allow for a woman to become president, given that women couldn’t vote when the Constitution was ratified.
“I’m not looking to take us back to quill pens and horse and buggy,” he began, but when she interrupted to ask for a straightforward response, his voice rose and he emphatically said, “Of course women can be president of the United States.”
“I’m the father of two daughters, and I hope one of them turns out to be president,” he added.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) also received a short reply when he pressed Gorsuch about his relationship with his dissertation supervisor at Oxford University, John Finnis, whom Democrats have accused of having “extreme anti-LGBT views.”
Gorsuch tried to defuse the tension with a reference to young adult literature, citing the “Harry Potter”-like atmosphere of his mentor’s office and saying Finnis “did not let an argument that I was working on go unchallenged from any direction.”
When pressed by Durbin, who asked, “And what about LGBTQ individuals?” Gorsuch said: “What about them? They’re people.”
He did all he could to keep the drama to a minimum as the day dragged on.
He admitted to being somewhat intimidated by the Senate grilling, apologized to his wife for putting her through the ordeal, joked with the clerks and reminisced about his chats with former Supreme Court Justice Byron White.
Gorsuch appeared to win points with Leahy, a longtime Judiciary Committee member, saying he “admired the various ways” Leahy tried to dig a substantive answer out of him on the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
That prompted laughter as Gorsuch gushed that Leahy would be a “formidable companion in the courtroom.”
The former Vermont prosecutor, who loves talking about his early career, all but blushed and said, “I’m just a lawyer from a small town.”
Republicans on the panel were clearly allied with the nominee, pitching friendly questions and seeking to dispel any notion that he would shy away from standing up to Trump.
Gorsuch insisted he was his “own man” at one point, after Franken noted that White House chief of staff Reince Priebus recently said his confirmation could potentially change 40 years of law.
“Respectfully, Mr. Priebus doesn’t speak for me, and I don’t speak for him,” Gorsuch said. “I don’t appreciate it when people characterize me. ... I am a judge. I am my own man.”
He said to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) that Trump never asked him to rule against the landmark abortion rights case Roe v. Wade.
“Senator, I would have walked out the door,” Gorsuch said of if the president had sought such a promise. “It’s not what judges do. I don’t do it at that end of Pennsylvania Avenue, and they shouldn’t do it at this end either, respectfully.”
The hearing became almost syrupy when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a former Supreme Court clerk himself, asked for Gorsuch’s fondest memories of clerking for White.
And Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) helped lighten the tone after a harsh line of questioning from Franken, praising Gorsuch’s stamina over hours of questioning.
“How in the world is Gorsuch able to go so many hours at a time without peeing?” Sasse asked, reading a text from his wife.
“The [Supreme Court] bladder is something that stands in awe,” he said.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters Tuesday the Senate is on track to vote on Gorsuch before lawmakers leave for a two-week recess on April 7.
But Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called on Republicans to delay the vote because of the ongoing investigation into coordination between Trump’s campaign team and Russian officials.
I am actually impressed that McConnell has Grorsuch seated by April 7th. That is really quick for a Supreme Court Judge.
They could have held the vot matter his answer on the first question about separation of powers. That told me all in need to Know. Vote to confirm
Yeah. They should just vote. There should be no delay.
Al Franken is overcompensating.
If he knew Jesus and how He paid the price so we could be forgiven. If he knew the humble, guilt and shame free life that leads to, Al would not feel the need to overcome all that shame with a fire hose of lies and corruption.
IMHO
He knows about Christ and has rejected him. For that he goes to hell #2.
I don’t feel superior, just blessed and fortunate.
/witness
I have no doubt it’s gonna take the nuclear option. The Rats will use the “under the cloud of an investigation” as cover. I won’t be surprised if Comey doesn’t drop another bond to delay the vote. He does sound a little to much like Roberts for comfort.
Gorsuch’s sharpest retorts were prompted by Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Al Franken (D-Minn.), who showed impatience with his repeated refusals to speak to his personal views.
_____
Sheldon seemed to be a little less constipated today though he’s always really impressed with himself. Franken acted like a rude, nasty clown.
What a disgusting spectacle. A bunch of degenerate, glad-handing, crooks get to attack their intellectual superior like that, and he has to sit there and take it.
Roberts was blackmailed.
Yes Sen. Feinstein (D-CA) is “rank” and yes, Sen. Leahy is still “Secrets Leaky”.
Schumer is in a class all by himself. “Insane” is insulting crazy people because Schmucky Chucky is way beyond that. He’s such an ahole that even ISIS wouldn’t want to get near him.
A failed comedian who never went to law school ends up on the Judiciary committee...
Whatever he was, he STINKS and should NEVER have put himself in the position to BE "blackmailed" in the first place. As "CHIEF JUSTICE", he untrustworthy and needs to be impeached and removed; but sadly, he won't be.
Take the Trump state RAT Senators...give Gorsuch a couple days up there sounding judicial, and they'll vote for him.
It's not an act.
It is beyond STUPID that the Schumer and Warren are trying to delay the vote over the Russian joke. It shows that they have nothing on Judge Gorsuch. I for one think that shutting down the filibuster would be refreshing. After all, it’s no longer sacrosanct after Reid fiddled with it in 2013. It’s likely just a matter of time before it’s shut down.
Gorsuch has to put up with these gutless brainless wonders to get confirmed. Then he can metaphorically tell them to kiss his ass as he’ll have a lifetime appointment.
He’ll have no trouble being nominated because he’s already been nominated.
He’ll also be confirmed.
That's when the balance of real power on the court will occur.
Yes, you are right. We know the liberal left will kill to further their agenda. Their greed for power knows no bounds.I believe Scalia was murdered. Roberts is still alive... half-a man. Really, how does an honest man deal with a dishonest man?
I don’t know where this will end. I support Trump and he is the only hope the United States of America has from the mire of corruption. Any thoughts?
I observed one thing past the obvious in that exchange. Mrs. Gorsuch is not to be underestimated. She sat behind her husband with a polite but small smile on her face for hours. When the Judge schooled DiFi her smile widen just a tad. I lol’ed.
Dems will block the vote over the Russia investigation. McConnell will go along with them and say that the investigation put the nuclear option off the table.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.