Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Link => http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/51/5164.asp
1 posted on 03/18/2017 12:55:10 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ken H

They proclaim loudly that they respect the Constitution. Then they pass laws like this, being sure to give it a nice-sounding name, like Civil Asset Forfeiture.
There is no forfeiture in this at all. It’s seizure. This is theft and a violation of the Constitution.


2 posted on 03/18/2017 12:58:10 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Lying Media: F*ck you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

IMO Clarence Thomas is one of the best Justices we’ve ever had - in some ways better than Scalia in faithfulness to the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended. We need four or five more just like him in the Suprme Court to steer our country back to being a Free Constitutional Republic where the Supreme Court does NOT unconstitutionally make national law and where their decisions ARE constitutionally based.


3 posted on 03/18/2017 12:59:35 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

When Justice Thomas speaks one does well to listen!


4 posted on 03/18/2017 1:01:08 PM PDT by Billyv (Freedom isn't Free! Get off the sidelines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H
Justice Thomas made his observations in the case of Lisa Olivia Leonard who was stopped in the notorious speed trap town of Cleveland, Texas on April 1, 2013 for allegedly driving 71 MPH in a 65 zone. The officers on the scene took $201,100 in cash she had in a safe, alongside a bill of sale for a house. For procedural reasons, the high court turned down Leonard's appeal, but Justice Thomas is looking forward to the opportunity of revisiting the forfeiture issue.

Good Lord! I pray you reverse this! Amen.

7 posted on 03/18/2017 1:15:31 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

I’m surprised the Supreme Court hasn’t already struck this down. It seems like one of those issues where the conservatives, like Thomas, and ACLU Ginsburg would agree.


11 posted on 03/18/2017 1:22:36 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

God Bless Justice Thomas. He and Alito are the only sane ones left.


14 posted on 03/18/2017 1:53:49 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

Damned straight.

It’s piracy under the rubric of givernment and it’s convoluted moral imperative and a conceit of imprimatur to enforce their deceit...


16 posted on 03/18/2017 2:21:55 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

Hear hear. It’s theft, it’s guilty until proven innocent, it’s rejection of due process, it’s usually unreasonable search and seizure both, it’s deprivation of rights under color of law, and it’s straight up corruption.


19 posted on 03/18/2017 2:47:55 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

In any matter where the underlying controversy is criminal in nature there should be no civil liability without there being a conviction first.


21 posted on 03/18/2017 3:20:49 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

What if they are convicted of a crime say illegal entry into the nation?


25 posted on 03/18/2017 6:05:46 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson