Posted on 03/16/2017 6:59:41 PM PDT by Helicondelta
Thursday at the White House press briefing while answering questions about President Donald Trump’s “America First Budget,” Office of Management and Budget director Mick Mulvaney called climate change research “a waste of your money” regarding proposed cuts in that area.
“Again, this comes back to the President’s business person view of government, which is if you took over this as a CEO and you look at this on a spreadsheet, and you go, ‘Why do we have all of these facilities? Why do we have seven when we can do the same job with three? Won’t that save money?'” he continued. “The answer is yes. So the part of your answer is focusing on efficiencies and focusing on doing what we do better. As to climate change, I think the President was fairly straightforward saying we’re not spending money on that anymore. We consider that to be a waste of your money to go out and do that. So that is a specific tie to his campaign.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
NASA need to shutdown GISS @ Columbia U and any Federal ORG funding of Mikey Mann at the State Pen needs to be terminated, with prejudice.
Mullally or close to that. Different guy....
I agree. Mulvaney was superb. he had nearly complete control of the facts and didn’t pussyfoot around at all. I’m surprised he came from Congress.
The Science is settled, we have a consensus, Why do we have any??
Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]Dear Administrator Jackson:
I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."
It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.
The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.
Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.
We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden's letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)
Put it online and let them download it. That's really cheap.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden’s letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
When is President Trump going to fire this Communist apparatchik holdover from the Obama regime?
Thanks for the correction. Mull..y. Mull..y — iceberg, Steinberg. ;>)
She is definitely crooked as a dog's hind leg. Lisa P. Jackson
IOWs she's a typical Dem.
Thank the Good Lord! If it is so important to libs, let THEM fund it!
Wxcellent!
You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here
Truly A D U H moment here....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.