Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If you’re a poor person in America, Trump’s budget is not for you
Washington Post ^ | March 16 2017 | By Steven Mufson and Tracy Jan

Posted on 03/16/2017 12:00:55 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

If you’re a poor person in America, President Trump’s budget proposal is not for you.

Trump has unveiled a budget that would slash or abolish programs that have provided low-income Americans with help on virtually all fronts, including affordable housing, banking, weatherizing homes, job training, paying home heating oil bills, and obtaining legal counsel in civil matters.

Gone would be $35 million in funding for well-known programs such as Habitat for Humanity and YouthBuild USA, fair housing planning, and homeless assistance, among other housing help for needy Americans.

Other targets include funding for neighborhood development and a home-buying program through which low-income individuals help build their own homes. Trump also plans to cut the Home Investment Partnership Program, the largest federal grant to state and local governments that is designed to create affordable housing.

Poor people need not lean on community banks for financial help, either, because Trump plans to eliminate the $210 million now dedicated toward Community Development Financial Institutions.

Alaska’s rural poor get hit by the budget proposal, too, despite having two Republican senators. The Agriculture budget would eliminate the Denali Commission, designed to deliver services to remote, rural communities in Alaska, including Native Americans.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bias; journalism; liberals; mediapac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The way I see it, Trump is giving people an added incentive to escape poverty.

Why carry someone when they can learn to run on their own?

21 posted on 03/16/2017 12:26:16 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Actually, the line can be taken in multiple ways.

Certainly the budget depends upon the affluent, not the poor. Trump has not suggested that he will hold those who cannot afford it, to contribute their fair share--now has he?

22 posted on 03/16/2017 12:28:31 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

When do the Los Angeles bums get a swift kick in the ass?


23 posted on 03/16/2017 12:29:19 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There are a lot of fat hogs sitting on their butts every day living off the public dole. They don’t look for work. They don’t want to work.
Their only “job” is reproduction so that the liberals will have plently of votes.
A lot of them are not even citizens of this country.

Many I have spoken to are getting sick and tired of being the only one in the neighborhood who takes of for work each day while the lazy slugs are still in bed. It’s disgusting.

They deserve to have their “ benefits” removed.
Jesus said be kind to your neighbor. He didn’t say we must support the entire neighborhood while they make no effort whatsoever to work themselves.


24 posted on 03/16/2017 12:30:47 PM PDT by doc maverick (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If you’re a poor person in America, Trump’s budget is not for you


So, he doesn’t reward poverty? Good.


25 posted on 03/16/2017 12:31:37 PM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
Trump has not suggested that he will hold those who cannot afford it, to contribute their fair share--now has he?

What is "fair share"?

26 posted on 03/16/2017 12:31:38 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Fair share under the revenue raising theories of the framers of the Constitution, would be based upon the then requirement that any direct tax on the people had to be per capita.

Now I know about the XVIth Amendment. But that is hardly the standard of what is fair. My comment was a bit of dry humor, however. Still it is interesting that we seem to have more evident ongoing poverty, since the XVIth than we had in Colonial times immediately before the Constitution. Note Jefferson's recital of Welfare in 1782:

Jefferson On Welfare.

27 posted on 03/16/2017 12:49:19 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wash Post HATES Poor People

That is a better title.


28 posted on 03/16/2017 12:50:46 PM PDT by TheNext (RyanCare is FAKE Healthcare! VETO VETO VETO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petro45acp

“...if you are a poor person...”
“Why are you poor?”

Exactly.

Yes, there are some seriously/legitimately/[however you want to describe it] poor. Encourage charity. Insofar as some fall thru the cracks, and there will be un-Constitutional pressure to do so, we may (considering other battles to fight) let the gov’t pitch in.

There are a great many who are poor because it has become a viable lifestyle choice. In the process of eradicating poverty by making it practically illegal, the gov’t is morally* obligated to support people who are not allowed functional poverty. Consequence is, if you’re OK with living at the poverty line (which many are), the gov’t will pay your way. Pretty luxurious actually. Sounds like a great budget line to trim or eviscerate.

* - if you’re going to do things wrong, you still need to mitigate the consequences. Better to do things right, but if you’re going to be stupid then at least be smart about it.


29 posted on 03/16/2017 12:58:07 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

“grandma will have to eat dog food coming in 5..4..3..2..1”

I’ve gone to Walmart and priced dog food vs an inexpensive yet healthy human food meal. With a little care & attention, human food is cheaper.


30 posted on 03/16/2017 12:59:59 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

At today’s presser Mulvaney pointed out that the budget is completely compassionate to those who are asked to fund programs that waste or otherwise do not deliver on their mission.

He was good.


31 posted on 03/16/2017 1:17:03 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
It also means that his budget is not for the unemployed,

His budget slashing of the EPA and his executive orders regarding energy are already increasing jobs.

32 posted on 03/16/2017 1:26:07 PM PDT by MrEdd (MrEdd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
redistribute to others, at the government's discretion,

minus a 50% cut. A charity with that kind of overhead percentage is called a scam.

33 posted on 03/16/2017 1:43:04 PM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Funny that you should mention “energy” when there are still many graduate engineers, who once worked in the energy sector, unemployed for years in Texas.

We have not (yet) initiated our long-awaited “energy independence” project and nothing seems to be on the horizon.


34 posted on 03/16/2017 1:44:52 PM PDT by 353FMG (AMERICA FIRST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Get off the welfare free ride, get a job and take care of your own family. The amount of people on welfare is ridiculous.. most of them just game the system. Enough of this already.


35 posted on 03/16/2017 2:37:51 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

It will take time for reigning in the EPA to affect every sector of the economy.

But Coal is beginning to revive now.


36 posted on 03/16/2017 2:44:23 PM PDT by MrEdd (MrEdd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I am not interested in saddling my grand- and great grand children with debt to care for non producers.


37 posted on 03/16/2017 3:07:07 PM PDT by Joe Bfstplk (A Irredeemable Deplorable Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Expected Leftist propaganda. Of course the Democrat WP is going to focus on women and children and poor hurt the worst. What it intentionally fails to cover is that the budget cuts the different government department to get them back to their core purpose. Mulvaney gave quite a few examples of how mission creep has expanded many of the departments well beyond their legal and authorized purpose. Example, why is Global Warming part of the State Dept, or Muslim outreach part of NASA and other examples. WP propaganda is all this is.


38 posted on 03/16/2017 4:08:01 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

They say “poor” person, I say lazy person. If one is a lazy good-for-nothing slouch, then President Trump’s budget isn’t for them! He wouldn’t have to slash the budget if not for Obama lavishly spending our taxdollars frivolously. Obama threw away future dollars that are making future generations poorer! President Trump is the grown-up trying to make things right again with our national budget.

So yes, you’re right, these so-called “poor” persons are welfare slugs and the like.


39 posted on 03/16/2017 5:55:34 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

If you are a poor person in America, there is a charity for you, not government, or, there will be if government gets out of the way.


40 posted on 03/16/2017 6:06:45 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson