Skip to comments.
Mobile-built Austal LCS stranded in Singapore (US Navy ship)
al com ^
| 2/22/17
| Harress
Posted on 03/16/2017 10:47:51 AM PDT by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
The LCS disaster is probably the US Navy's biggest peacetime mistake in its history. The Navy committed to getting as many as 80 of these "little crappy ships" (per one surface warfare admiral) to build-up the Navy's ability to fight littoral (brown- and shallow-water) wars. The entire concept of building many cheap ships crewed by not nearly enough sailors (original estimate was a ridiculous 40 man crew) and warfare modules that can be swapped out in 21 days has collapsed. The ships do not work and the exhausted crew cannot cope. Now all of them are dry-docked for repair and /or modification. The concept of multi-crew ships has been blown-up by a training program that cannot train crews fast enough to be proficient.
1
posted on
03/16/2017 10:47:51 AM PDT
by
pabianice
To: pabianice
Build the Montana class BBs.
2
posted on
03/16/2017 10:51:57 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Die Gedanken sind Frei)
To: pabianice
Build the Montana class BBs.
3
posted on
03/16/2017 10:52:01 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Die Gedanken sind Frei)
To: pabianice
Mean Time Between Failure (MBTF) for naval vessels may be measured in hours, but not usually in single digits, but for the LC it seems to be.
4
posted on
03/16/2017 10:53:30 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
To: pabianice
"They were being told April, now they are being told mid-to-late May," Seriously?
I remember deployments that were open ended during the Persian Gulf War. Ordered to pack for thirty days come home in 179 (one day short of a PCS). Only one flight suit through the whole thing. It soon became a matter if pride to see who's was the most gamey.
Does anyone know what Stop Loss did to the troops?? Their enlistments were extended for months or years for the needs of the service. That's hardship.
5
posted on
03/16/2017 10:56:18 AM PDT
by
pfflier
To: pabianice
6
posted on
03/16/2017 11:08:31 AM PDT
by
SueRae
(An administration like no other.)
To: pabianice
But do they have transgender bathrooms? After all, this is the New Navy.
7
posted on
03/16/2017 11:12:47 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: pabianice
...original estimate was a ridiculous 40 man crew... Four watch sections of only ten men each. OOPS! Forgot to back out the Skipper and XO, 2 cooks, 2 stewards, 2 master-at-arms...leaves four 8 man watch sections. Or could go three sections with more deck apes and no stewards, 12-man sections and dog watches for rotation.
8
posted on
03/16/2017 11:31:42 AM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: JimRed
4? On my FFG we were port/stbd for nearly two years. But then the OHPs had a similar proposed manning issue. I think they were supposed to be ~150 peacetime and ~190-200 during conflict, but when you’re forward deployed there really isn’t any down time... and we sure didn’t staff up during gulf-1
9
posted on
03/16/2017 11:43:23 AM PDT
by
reed13k
To: pabianice
50 years ago men were recruited from farm country...today's men and women, have no/no mechanical sense, like checking the oil levels in the propeller reduction gear box....
10
posted on
03/16/2017 11:57:17 AM PDT
by
B212
To: pabianice
People, unless they have been in the Navy, don’t realize that a normal work day re your skill set is a minimal 8 hours.
Then, you stand 2 separate 4 hours watches.
That is on a normal day. On other days, any problems, GQ’s, training exercises take precedence.
On these ships, the crews wear out. So does the electronic and mechanical gear and the ship due to lack of preventive maintence time.
Then, when your ship doesn’t return to its homeport, your family suffers even more because you are still at sea.
11
posted on
03/16/2017 11:59:13 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
( Remember during Trump Tower Spygate, there were No American fingerprints; just Obama's...!!!!:))
To: pfflier
Never accept a free flight suit from a real air jock.
If a Navy Doc offers you his, it was probably like new.
I have stolen your Mark Twain re newspapers and your Who watches the night watchman.:)
You can use my other Latin Phrase, Cui Bono! Who benefits, when you can’t figure what is happening, why and so who benefits!
12
posted on
03/16/2017 12:18:07 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
( Remember during Trump Tower Spygate, there were No American fingerprints; just Obama's...!!!!:))
To: Jim Noble
let’s resurrect the Spad and Jenny too.
To: Jim Noble
Build the Montana class BBs. Because wasting $30 billion on the LCS program wasn't enough money down the drain?
To: pabianice
Then there’s the vaunted F-35 ... peas in a pod - both designed by committees to do everything and nothing well - so nothing works.
15
posted on
03/16/2017 12:47:48 PM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: DoodleDawg; RitchieAprile
Well, there are two differences between the Montana class BBs and the LCS:
1) We need more workers and more domestic steel to build them, and
2) In shallow water they look badass rather than like toys.
16
posted on
03/16/2017 12:56:22 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Die Gedanken sind Frei)
To: Jim Noble
Well, there are two differences between the Montana class BBs and the LCS And one similarity - both are useless in today's naval scenarios.
To: Jim Noble
Build the Montana class BBs.
We can’t...no armor plants, gun lathes, gun pits, steam spares, etc. Even the existing spares were scrapped by certain past administrations.
18
posted on
03/16/2017 1:45:16 PM PDT
by
Hiryusan
To: Hiryusan
We cant...no armor plants, gun lathes, gun pits, steam spares, etcSo, build 'em.
#MAGA
19
posted on
03/16/2017 2:26:03 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Die Gedanken sind Frei)
To: Jim Noble
Why build a ship that’s offensive capability is only 24-25 miles.
20
posted on
03/16/2017 4:07:02 PM PDT
by
Bull Snipe
(ueewl ocwe)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson