Posted on 03/14/2017 12:22:06 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
So, what specific “real world problems” have been solved in third world countries by US global warming data?
So, in short the British are saying their stance on climate change is based on American input? Anyone else see something fishy there?
Goody! An unexpected bonus!
One more issue we're winning on...
The only Wanker Institute is the one that Google has indexed for this thread. FR is now the home of fake news too.
Not Tired Of Winning.
“Wanker Institute.”
It doesn’t get any better than that!
I’m from the Wanker Institute and I’m here to lend a hand...
>>And they say Trump’s travel ban is already harming their collaboration with scientists in America.
Because so many so-called climate scientists have dual U.K. - temporary travel ban country citizenship? I call BS, this is fake news.
“Her institute works with governments and scientists in some of the world’s most fragile, conflict-affected countries, applying climate science to solve real-world problems. “
since climate “science” is political pseudo-science, can you imagine the solutions they are suggesting to “real-world” problems [as opposed to unreal-world fantasy problems]? wonder how much her institute would charge to make the sun shine more often in the U.K.?
“Wanker Institute at Reading University”
i think you subconsciously misspelled the institute name from “Walker” to “Wanker,” being that it is a British institute, as a wanker is a British slang term of derogatory appellation for a man of dubious renown.
“Very expensive bullshit indeed. And the early signs are very very good.”
except those early signs aren’t cutting the budget of the right organizational component of NOAA known as Climate.gov. that is where National Weather Service [NWS] “climatologists” manipulated weather data to support Obama’s claim of global warming by CO2 right as Obama’s was heading off to participate in the Paris Climate Accord Conference.
cutting satellite funding which impacts data collection is not going to change the climatologists mindset of selectively picking of data points to support their masters pseudo-science of anthropogenic global warming. you have to get rid of researchers who maipulate the real data to support their political science position of climate change.
someone needs to get this info to Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce, the parent organization of NOAA and NWS.
W-T-F-Cares!?
No, dont cut the research! Re-direct it to honest scientists who will expose the hoax and display all the huge errors made by the IPCC.
All we have right now are pro-AGW research papers. We need to combat them withbhundreds of new research papers that show that AGW theory is almost certainly false. Keep researching, just against the warming alarmist conclusions.
“I’m from the Wanker Institute and I’m here to lend a hand...”
LOL !!!
director of the Wanker Institute at Reading University
“Wanker”? Isn’t that a derogatory term in the UK?
Or am I mistaken?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.