The NYT = the Ministry of Truth.
The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.
btt
Webs we weave, practice to deceive and all that.
Seems the Dems have been buying their Dirty Tricks(tm) from ACME, inc. and now it’s all blown up in their faces, Wile-E Coyote-style.
Haven’t always been a big fan of Andrew McCarthy, but this is what real journalism looks like. Calling out the Obama administration and their sidekick the Failing New York Times. He’s got them cornered. As usual though, for those who would not believe, no proof is sufficient.
Trump finally called “bullsh_t” and they blinked. Folks this is what fighting back looks like.
The problem with electronic books and media, the record is no longer permanent and can be changed with the political wind.
Why would the Times change its headline in this manner, weeks after the fact?
GOOD QUESTION...............................
This is a Scandal all on its own for the Times to do this is pure straight 1984 memory hole stuff!!!
That what the 1984 hero did for the state... take an old article in the library that had an inconvenient fact. Edit it to for reflect the current party line and Destroy evidence of the old article. Scrubbing history
That this is become such a relevant story and for the quote “paper of record” to then scrub this is a crime. And just beyond stupid to boot. But also scary if you think about it
Because if they'll do this on something that everybody knows because we are seeing it done before our eyes....
You can assume they go back to all articles and scrub them up Politically Incorrect facts or inconvenient before they get caught ...
The NYT alter the news. The "Paper of record" Alters the record to reflect whatever's convenient for their political desire of the moment
New York Times: the Paper of Altered Record
This is nothing less than Evil. Pure Lying Evil. Right in front of our faces.
(2009) The firm headed by Hillary Clinton’s former chief strategist, Mark Penn, is helping run incumbent President Victor Yushchenko’s campaign. Meanwhile Paul Manafort, whose firm worked on Republican John McCain’s losing effort, and Tad Devine, a top strategist on the Democratic presidential campaigns of Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004, are consulting for Victor Yanukovych, the pro-Russian frontrunner in the polls.Both Manafort and Devine consulted for Victor Yanukovych.http://www.politico.com/story/2009/11/obama-consultants-land-abroad-029410
Trump adviser Manfort was viciously attacked for being "linked to Russia". Not a peep was said about Sanders adviser Devine. [1][2]
Why is that?
[2] http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/tad-devine-inside-bernie-sanders-campaign-220357
More info on the NY Times:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPx2OwYSsAQ
Summary: from China Uncensored.
NY Times maybe only western newspaper in China because NY Times turns a blind eye to Chinese human rights abuses and genocide.
Me: not surprising given its history.
Sorry for clunky post.
The Russia/Trump narrative seems to have originated with Alexandra Chalupa, a long time Democrat operative and a Ukrainian activist. She worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. She co-founded the Ethnic Council of the Democratic Party. She organized protests against Manafort.
The narrative is heavily promoted on twitter by Andrea Chalupa, a Ukrainian activist and Alexandra’s daughter. She founded DigitalMaidan, an online movement that made the Ukrainian protests the #1 trending topic on Twitter worldwide
Irena Chalupa, a Ukrainian activist and Alexandra’s daughter(?) is a fellow at the Atlantic Council. Former Ukrainian president Leonid Kuchma’s son-in-law, Victor Pinchuk, sits on the Advisory Board of the Atlantic Council. In 2015 he donated between $100,000 $249,000 to the Atlantic Council.
The claim that Russia breached the DNC email system originates with Crowdstrike, a company founded by Dmitri Alperovitch. Alperovitch is a fellow at the Atlantic Council. Crowdstrike is closely associated with and heavily funded by Clinton colleague Timothy Geithner. Geithner’s company, Warburg Pincus, has provided $100M to Crowdstrike and 30% of Crowdstrike’s board members are from Warburg Pincus. He is a disgruntled Russian emigre.
The DNC refused FBI access to their email system, instead they were made to rely on Alperovitch’s investigation. Alperovitch bases his claim partly on the claims of a Russian blogger. The blogger claims that Ukrainian military units were targeted via malware inserted onto Ukrainian tablet computers, the malware provided to Russia the location of Ukrainian troops. As “evidence” the blogger cites a 2016 International Institute for Strategic Studies report of a sharp reduction of Ukrainian D-30 howitzers between 2013 and 2015. Ukraine denies any large loss of D-30 howitzers in this period. Alperovitch claims this same malware was used to breach the DNC email system. The malware has been available for years prior to the DNC breach.
Clinton’s “Russia narrative” originates with Russia hating Ukrainians who worked for the Clintons. Claims that “Russia hacked the DNC” are based on the dubious claims of persons funded by Clinton associates.
There’s more...
In October 2016 Andrea Chalupa tweeted “In intel circles, the story goes FSB filmed Trump in an orgy while in Russia. Yes, this all ends in a Trump sex tape.” This claim eventually surfaced in Buzzfeed’s “dossier” in January, 2017.
These attacks on Trump all originate with Clinton associates.
Frpm the article
“...
matters did not come to a head until last Saturday morning. In a tweet-burst, President Trump made the controversial allegation that President Obama had ordered that Trump be subjected to wiretapping at Trump Tower, where his campaign had been headquartered.
To say the least, it is unfortunate that this was the angle Trump chose to pursue. There is plenty of support for the overarching proposition that the Obama administration used its law-enforcement and intelligence powers to investigate Trump associates during the campaign. There is, to my knowledge, no evidence that Trump personally was wiretapped. So instead of highlighting the alarming things that may be true, President Trump’s tweets obsessed over something that probably is not true.
Nevertheless, even if Trump’s allegation was false, the tweets demanded attention to the real scandal: Was the Obama administration investigating the Trump campaign? ...”
Author is wrong.
Trump campaign & Trump Tower comms are one and the same.
For the author to say that President Trump was wrong to say his tower was bugged, and not say his campaign was bugged is splitting hairs.
I think Why is a rhetorical question, right?
Keep posting that original front page of Jan 20 with the red circles. For chuckles, post the new one side by side.
This is not like an actual correction, now is it? It is an attempt to pull off a huge lie.
Ironic, the NYT meme about truth, eh?
This is absolutely the best.
Ima come right out and say it:
Journalists are stupid!
Change a headline from three months ago? One that’s gone viral already with the red circles? Why not just send your people out the door with sandwich boards that read:
I am so stupid. Kick me.