Because a complete repeal requires a ‘replace’ that would need 60 votes in the Senate.
Besides, if “complete repeal” is taken literally it means removing those between 21 and 26 from parent’s plans.
It means not covering pre-existing conditions.
Repealing those elements is political suicide.
Agreed. We should “repair” Obamacare. Delete everything except the paragraph that allows junior to stay on Mommy’s insurance until age 26. That is the perfect fix to a fatally-flawed law.
You’ve bought into what the liberals sold and own the language. Why replace? Why not just repeal period? What was wrong with my healthcare pre Obamacare!? Why have we let libtards beat repubtards in owning the language? My healthcare was just fine ore Obamacare so repeal and not replace. And a complete repeal doesn’t require 60 does it thank to Harry Reid?
No Republicans voted for Obamacare though. Please remember that. It is not their problem if 26 year old son lose their coverage.
Repeal the whole thing and write those “features” into the new law then. BTW, covering pre existing conditions is not insurance.
At some point we are going to have to make a tough decision about pre-existing conditions and underwriting. This is s dodge and Obamacare 2.0.
The pathetic 26 year old snowflake/pajama boys should have moved out of Mom’s basement and on their own when they turned 18.
Bingo. Now take the next step. CONTINUING those elements without single payer is economic suicide.
Any plan covering pre-existing conditions is not insurance but socialized medicine.