Heres the problem with the story connecting Russia to Donald Trumps email server

theintercept.com ^ | November 1 2016

[tophat9000]

Oh its reinforces it was beyond crap... any computer person would know its was pure crap in two minutes ...

If you can’t dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshi-

If they got the warrant on this they deliberately baffled the court with bullshi-

[HarleyLady27]

How about we post something on the OLD Raiders ... ROFL!!!

[HarleyLady27]

Yes I read it and more....

Slate Oct 2016

Slate Nov

Trump Server Info

[Nifster]

Actually it isn’t....though the comments are

[Nifster]

Thanks. This was a good reading and excellent analysis

[Steve_Seattle]

"...and it’s a POS article...just like Slate..."

Did you read it? It largely debunks the idea that there's anything about this server/domain that implicates Trump in any wrongdoing.

[Steve_Seattle]

This article is an excellent example of why people who go beyond the biased sound-bites of the MSM can actually get to the real FACTS behind a story.

[Vehmgericht]

I thought that people who believed in conspiracy theories were supposed to be crazy.

[Lopeover]

Russians spam the US. Trump org like any other business probably received spam phishing emails.

[Ben Hecks]

FYI

[tophat9000]

So what do you disagree with and why

Of what you’ve read point of the article you think is true and why

As a network engineer and computer security person this article to me is the most coherent in laying out the bogus of the whole thing

[TigersEye]

How did they get all that detailed information if 0bama wasn’t surveilling Trump?

The #FakeNews Corps need to pick a story and try to make it stick. lol

[DannyTN]

If you go to the article, some of the communications intercepted was advertisments for Trump hotels.

[dr_lew]

Is? Well, it depends on the meaning of is....

I take it that this is in reference to Bill Clinton's infamous, "It depends on what the definition of 'is' is."

I will defend Bill Clinton, as I have steadfastly done, by pointing out that he was responding to a question of the form, "Is there a relationship ... ?", so probably he just should have said "No." But as his response reveals, there was a relationship at one time, so with this quibble, he was in effect spilling his guts.