Posted on 03/06/2017 8:58:37 AM PST by TigerClaws
Hidden in plain sight. Best. Damn. Election. Ever.
Allegedly, they were wiretapping the Russians, not the Trump aides.
...”intelligence agencies concluded that the Russian government had worked to help elect him...”
Of course, they did. They were grateful that he gave up 20% of our uranium and were glad to give him 500K for a speech.
The media has their you-know-whats in the wringer, no matter which way this goes. Either they LIED in collusion with the Obama cabal to try to keep Trump from being inaugurated or now thrown out of office OR they received classified info & published it.
Well well well
Is this the same article referenced by Levin on Fox yesterday? If not, then there is another Slimes article on wiretapping.
So which is it, MSM and oCommies? Was there wiretapping? Or did your holy book of leftist “journOlism” create (more) #FakeNews
No one questions the absolute fact of wire taps during the campaign on the Republican Campaign by obama administration. It was based on a bogus pretext of a fisa warrants issued on false affidavits or on worthless concocted affidavits. The warrant and the supporting affidavits must now be released by the President on his order to expose this plan to BUG the Trump campaign. We want the warrants— the order denying and the order granting and the recordings of all of the taps!! —all of them — all recordings of all the illegal taps . Let’s see what these transcripts were recording? Hillary was given direct access to these reports and bragged about knowing about the trump tower server hack in her own TWEET!! Quit messing with this and let’s get it before the people who now have an absolute right to know about these criminal wire taps 6 weeks before the election. Screw congressional worthless hearings!!
This was Rush’s lead today.
Can’t be.
Pelosi said “we don’t do that”.
Link to the NY Times article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html?_r=0
This will be buried. It won’t be covered.
Which begs the question, though: If they are wiretapping a foreign national and the person on the other end of the conversation turns out to be a U.S. citizen, do any legal complications arise? Or does the involvement of a foreign national target give them license to eavesdrop on the U.S. citizen?
Well, NYT,is it true or not? First they say it’s true, now it’s not true? They either lied the first time or they’re lying now.
I nominate the NYT for a Pulitzer prize for this excellent piece of reporting!
They’re supposed to redact the parts with citizen. They may have redacted it, then leaked it. Who knows...yet.
FWIW, That NYT article doesn’t mention nobama.
They’re supposed to redact the parts with citizen. They may have redacted it, then leaked it. Who knows...yet.
PING!!!!
Article and comments
Thanks, TigerClaws
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.