Like this?
So if this was cave man times, US citizens couldn’t use clubs, because clubs were weapons of war?
If it was the 1800’s, citizens could not possess muskets, because muskets were weapons of war?
Makes sense!
I remember the days when, even though I was STEM type, I respected the law.
No longer.
Lib lawyers are right out of Alice....words mean what they want them to mean.
This will NOT end well.
Especially for lib lawyers.
Solution:
Pink paint
Hello Kitty stickers
Full auto
The 4th has ruled now let them try to enforce it.
Try and take them.
Well, if/when it comes down to it...they’re going to find out that a lot (if not the majority) of us have things they don’t want us to have.
That will enable us to get things that we’ve never been able to have.
BUT.....if/when.....the Military is going to be on our side and we won’t need them anyway.
Like this?
Impeach the 4th Circuit court!
Oh, wait. That would require Congress to do its Constitutional responsibility.
Never mind.
Wow about my Spartan Shield?
Private citizens have always had better personal weapons than the US Army up until 1956.
Army-Flintlock muzzle loader, Civilian -Rifle.
Army adopts muzzle loading rifle, Civilians had breach loaders.
Army adopts Breachloader, Civilians had tube fed rapid fire lever action rifles.
Army finally adopts a good bolt action rifle, Civilians had tube fed, slide action, lever action, bolt action, semi-auto rifles and were experimenting with full auto rifles.
1936-Army adopts a semi-auto rifle. Civilians already had them for forty years.
1956 Army adopts a select fire rifle, something a civilian cannot have.
Now suddenly the government is afraid of Civilians with imitation military rifles.
It seems too nebulous and overly broad to qualify as a legal definition.
Until Trump fills the 100 vacant judges positions around the country, we will continue seeing this. I know he has a ton to do but this would have been done already had I been President. (LOL).
But other government gun-grabers have argued that the militia referred to, and protected, in the 2nd amendment are actually the individual state National Guard units.
So now the 4th circuit court bars the militia (National Guard?) from having scary military looking weapons but does not bar the individual citizen from owning them.
Yet it i s the individual citizen that comprises the militia.
Has any liberal ever thought through to what the final and true effect of their actions really are?
I doubt it.
.
That is not what the court said at all.
This is complete click-bait BS
Does this mean my wife can have a pink full auto weapon??
They completely misread a small part of the Heller decision that says some weapons designed for the military aren’t covered, by which they were referring to things like artillery and crew fired machine guns. They extended that to mean anything that looks like the army could use it, completely turning the meaning of the 2A and Heller on it’s head.
Your blog ain’t news
These pedophiles, lesbians and fags on the Fourth Circus have got to go. Americans need to stand up and teach the bastards who the Bill of Rights belong to. It isn’t the sexual deviants in the U.S. Government.
