Posted on 03/05/2017 3:26:18 PM PST by LibFreeUSA
Trump does have the evidence according to ex-CIA official.
Must watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9M5HlzCulc
Trump may not have the evidence because the speculation is that the British intelligence agency GCHQ did the wiretapping resulting in British Prime Minister asking the head of that agency Robert Hannigan to quietly leave his position this past week for “family reasons”. Hannigan was known for flying the LGBT flag over the headquarters building of GCHQ.
Seems like he is saying “wiretap” is wrong word...and thus giving dems an out
...and Kelly better find a bear that’s willing to let him move in to his he hibernation spot
This one’s shaping up to be a major disappointment.
It’s looking like all this was was using a collection of media stories to make an accusation, to counter the other media accusations of russian “collusion”.
To not have records of warrants, or attempts to get them, in advance of publicizing this looks like a newbie error.
Consider - if true but no records in hand, this would be a cataclysmic demonstration of state corruption in the US. So, armed with only reports in the media, the administration would now have to trust this very same corrupt state to produce the documentation it needs.
Making the accusation without the backup only gives the deep state an advance warning of what’s coming. Congratulations, now they can start destroying evidence.
I hope Trump does have the records, if not, he just bit off more than he can chew with this one.
I’m sure many will try to characterize it as some sort of “master stroke”.
Or in more direct talk to them, you guys s%$t or get off the pot.
I believe Trump. The others are all lying weasels - particularly that ugly Clapper who looks like something from a cartoon.
The wording of Trump's tweet is totally trivial if the thrust of the claim is in essence true.
Trump is holding his cards close to his vest and they will be laid down when it is appropriate to lay them down.
didn’t Trump’s tweet have wire tap in quotes?
He was an advisor to Blair...who has been meeting with Kushner
Just say no to Blair
didn’t i read that the FBI was going to pay the British agent who collaborated on “golden” fake dossier - so FBI was part of effort to bring down DJT? how can the surveillance be denied - we have evidence from many newspapers, from HrC tweet of 10/31, etc. something’s rotten at FBI
KEYWORD: “believes” he has the evidence”.
GREAT POST, Texas.
(We are all getting played by missing the fine print and failing to find the facts, from the hopey-changey words being used that are not facts.)
He’s a businessman who no doubt has seen many of his own departments fall into political chaos. He just removes the provocateurs so the business unit can get back running on all 8s.
I hope the sociopaths never saw it coming; they ususally never do.
Not immaterial. He gives them an out and they may not be lying..cementing their side into john q public memory.
If you are going to make an accusation you need not give wiggle room as big as a barn door
Some people here immediately picked up on that and asked why.
Four exclamation point on a story with no evidence on the evidence?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.