Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Trump Meets W/AG Sessions. Obama Wiretapping: “INDICTMENTS"
DC Whispers ^ | 03-04-2016

Posted on 03/04/2017 10:00:35 PM PST by Kevin in California

Various sources have indicated President Trump is meeting this evening in Mara-a-Lago with Attorney General Jeff Sessions to discuss the blockbuster breaking story of former President Barack Obama’s misuse of federal authority to tamper with the 2016 presidential election. Earlier today, intelligence expert Lt. Colonel Tony Schaffer called the revelations a game-changer, and one that might very well lead to indictments against a former president and members of his staff.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 20160304; maralago; sessions; shadowgovernment; softcoup; tonyschaffer; trump; wiretap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last
Indictments? One can only pray.
1 posted on 03/04/2017 10:00:35 PM PST by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

“Indictments? One can only pray.”

We know that President Trump has proof that Obama wiretapped Trump during that campaign and with proof of the crime, a grand jury indictment will be a piece of cake.


2 posted on 03/04/2017 10:02:58 PM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Wow,This aint going away.


3 posted on 03/04/2017 10:04:01 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
These @ssholes are going to get their own anchor draped around their own necks.

After all the media bullsh!t about the Russians allegedly interfering with the 2016 election, they can't talk their way out of their own interference in the election.

4 posted on 03/04/2017 10:04:22 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Less Than $817 To Go!!
Even George Would Be Shocked
To Find Some FReepers
Haven't Donated To FR This Quarter!
Every Dollar Helps!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


5 posted on 03/04/2017 10:04:33 PM PST by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

I remember when Hillary was going to be indicted for gross mishandling of classified information and public corruption.

Wake me up when Obama gets indicted.


6 posted on 03/04/2017 10:05:03 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

It took Trump to say it.


Tonights Secret word is


7 posted on 03/04/2017 10:05:35 PM PST by Delta 21 (The minority demands NOTHING !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

I sure hope so.. and when they say Sessions recused himself... they can fly that kite now... this is a whole different game.. Sessions and Trump... go for the jugular!! don’t go soft! it’s time to give it to them... they are in no position to do much.. they got in it, big time!


8 posted on 03/04/2017 10:05:42 PM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Rudy Giuliani for Special Prosecutor.


9 posted on 03/04/2017 10:06:03 PM PST by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

This is Hugh and Series.

Kattie beat the door, the libs are going to have the mother of all freak-outs if Trump has Black Jesus indicted.


10 posted on 03/04/2017 10:06:20 PM PST by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

11 posted on 03/04/2017 10:06:30 PM PST by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

When even a useless senator like Lindsay Graham uses the Watergate word to describe Obamas actions, we have gone WAY past the TALL WEEDS! NOW we are in deep SWAMPLAND!


12 posted on 03/04/2017 10:07:06 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

When they drill down into who signed documents...it’ll be strictly junior Attorney General players and the judges. The judges ought to be just brought into the Senate and impeached. The FISA rules say that the Attorney General should be the authority signing off, but I doubt seriously that she signed any of the documents submitted and will just act surprised that this occurred. Beyond that....no one else will end up facing court action.


13 posted on 03/04/2017 10:07:19 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

It’s a new day and age.

Hillary wasn’t indicted only because Obama was in control of the whole process.

Now Trump’s in control. People are going to go down big over this.


14 posted on 03/04/2017 10:08:06 PM PST by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

15 posted on 03/04/2017 10:08:55 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eaglestar

16 posted on 03/04/2017 10:09:00 PM PST by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

It would seem that this story has the ‘legs’ of a marathon runner. I will not be surprised if we wake up to the news of some shocking false flag that will push this story off of the front page.


17 posted on 03/04/2017 10:09:32 PM PST by Trumpnado2016 (It's time for America to dream again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Even if there was an indictment, what jury would ever convict him? There would always be at least one who would hang the jury.


18 posted on 03/04/2017 10:09:40 PM PST by doug from upland (Hey, traitor Democrats. I have a tree. I'm sure another FReeper has a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie
Sessions' recusal makes more sense now than it did on Thursday.

He didn't recuse himself because of a potential conflict of interest as a target in the investigation. He recused himself because there's a good chance his phone calls and e-mails were illegally intercepted by the Obama administration. If that were the case, then he can't be involved in the investigation because he's likely to be a witness for the prosecution.

19 posted on 03/04/2017 10:09:42 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

The narrative of the MSM of today is that his claims are unsubstantiated. We know that is going to change.


20 posted on 03/04/2017 10:10:11 PM PST by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson