Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: Deployed US Navy Has A Pregnancy Problem, And It’s Getting Worse
The Daily Caller ^ | 3-1-2017 | Richard Pollock

Posted on 03/02/2017 1:19:48 PM PST by Sergio

A record 16 out of 100 Navy women are reassigned from ships to shore duty due to pregnancy, according to data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group.

That number is up 2 percent from 2015, representing hundreds more who have to cut their deployments short, taxing both their unit’s manpower, military budgets and combat readiness. Further, such increases cast a shadow over the lofty gender integration goals set by former President Barack Obama.

Overall, women unexpectedly leave their stations on Navy ships as much as 50% more frequently to return to land duty, according to documents obtained from the Navy. The statistics were compiled by the Navy Personnel Command at the request of TheDCNF, covering the period from January 2015 to September 2016.

The evacuation of pregnant women is costly for the Navy. Jude Eden, a nationally known author about women in the military who served in 2004 as a Marine deployed to Iraq said a single transfer can cost the Navy up to $30,000 for each woman trained for a specific task, then evacuated from an active duty ship and sent to land. That figure translates into $115 million in expenses for 2016 alone.

“This is an avoidable cost and expense, leaving a gap for other people to pick up the work slack,” Eden said.

“A pregnancy takes you out of action for about two years. And there’s no replacement,” said Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, a nonpartisan public policy organization. “So everybody else has to work all that harder,” adding that on small ships and on submarines, “you really have a potential crew disaster.”

Navy Lt. Cmdr. Nathan Christensen told TheDCNF the Navy tries to plan for the unplanned.

“Just as we deal with other unplanned manning losses due to injury or other hardships, we work to ensure that pregnant service members are taken care of and that commands are equipped to fulfill their missions when an unexpected loss occurs,” he said.

In January 2015, 3,335 women were pregnant aboard military vessels, representing about 14 percent of the 23,735 women then serving such duty, according to the data.

But by August 2016 that number reached nearly 16 percent, an all-time high. The Navy reported 3,840 of the 24,259 women sailors who were aboard Navy ships were pregnant.

The Obama administration understated the pregnancy problem throughout its eight years and even suppressed some data about the impact of its “gender-neutral” policies on the Navy.

For decades, for instance, the Navy published results from exhaustive surveys of 25,000 men and women in a document called the “Navy Pregnancy and Parenthood Survey.”

The reports once were 75 to 100 pages long and disclosed attitudes among men and women and their behavior. However, the Obama administration published only brief two to three-page summaries from 2012 onward.

A civilian attached to the Navy Personnel, Research, Studies and Technology group, which researched and published the surveys, told TheDCNF full reports were completed regularly even though it’s detailed findings were not released to the public. The individual requested anonymity.

“The military has been tight lipped over the years about these numbers. They don’t like to publicize them,” Eden told TheDCNF.

The Navy has been dogged for years by lingering claims that some women get pregnant simply to avoid deployment.

“We all know that happens. Women do it to avoid deployment,” Eden told TheDCNF.

“There do seem to be coincidences,” said Donnelly. “There is a lot of anecdotal evidence.”

“This information is considered so sensitive. You just don’t talk about it. And you don’t ask. It’s just something that everybody knows occurs. Don’t ask, don’t tell,” Donnelly said. She served on the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services and on the Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces.

The sudden departure of pregnant women aboard military vessels severely hurts military readiness and morale for those left behind and who must pick up the slack. The expecting sailors must be transferred from a ship after the 20th week of pregnancy.

The Navy officially considered pregnancy incompatible with military service and women who became pregnant were automatically discharged, according to The Alliance for National Defense.

However, with the introduction of the all-volunteer military, the Navy provided many lucrative incentives to men and women — including free housing, medical care, recreation and educational opportunities. But women got additional benefits, including free prenatal care, daycare, counseling, and special education for toddlers and children with disabilities or for other “special needs.”

“Since benefits offered to recruits who are women are so very generous, it almost becomes an incentive,” said Donnelly. “One feminist advocate many years ago referred to the military as a ‘Mecca for single moms.'”

“I think there are so many carrots. The military has become a modern-day jobs program,” Eden said. Obama during his eight years in office sought to increase dramatically the number of women on ships. In May 2015, Admiral Michelle Howard announced a quota of 25% women on all ships. “We’re going back and looking at the ships — all of them — and what percentage of women are on the ships. Over time, we’ll modernize them to make sure we get to about 25 percent on each ship,” she said.

Former Navy Secretary Ray Mabus in September 2015 pushed the new policy, stating that the Navy SEALs and all other combat jobs in the Navy should be open to women, with no exemptions as part of the Pentagon’s new “gender-neutral” employment policy.

Eden believes the policy of increasing women on ships results in failure. “It’s bad policy when you think of ships that have to be battle-ready and then have to transfer women off for pregnancy — something that has to do with controlled behavior or voluntary behavior,” she said.

It is unclear how President Donald Trump’s Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis will handle women in the military. He has been a skeptic, but also said during his confirmation hearing he would support a combat role for women.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: genderwar; integration; navy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Dilbert San Diego

Women in the Navy are allowed to have sex. They have to keep it within their rank if they are banging someone in the service. The problem is many get pregnant on purpose to miss deployment.


21 posted on 03/02/2017 1:41:28 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Are they implying that all the pregnancies are due to shipboard dalliances?

That is how I understood it.

22 posted on 03/02/2017 1:42:03 PM PST by Chgogal (I will NOT submit, therefore, Jihadists hate me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

I heard that some women on some ships can make MAAAJOR BANK, doing friendly favors for men who’ll pay.

Talk about a hostage customer base, right?

Guaranteed Deployment Ten.


23 posted on 03/02/2017 1:43:24 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man

Leavenworth is an Army prison. The Navy has their own prisons.


24 posted on 03/02/2017 1:43:40 PM PST by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The intel I got from folks deployed during the first Gulf War (’91) was that women that did not want to be in the sandbox would get pregnant to get shipped state side.

I knew an Intel officer, unit commander type, who got pregnant while in Saudi. This was not a case of wanting to skip out and go home, but the result of not taking precautions was the same. A promising military career was ruined, but more importantly, a vital unit, in theater, during combat, was suddenly without a C.O.


25 posted on 03/02/2017 1:58:48 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sergio
Who didn't see THIS coming?

Don't like your duty assignment? GET KNOCKED UP!

F'ing stupid to put women aboard ships.

26 posted on 03/02/2017 2:01:35 PM PST by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

Have these horndogs never heard of birth control? They should be discharged for stupidity.


27 posted on 03/02/2017 2:09:32 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
There are no excuses for pregnancies in this day and age. There are all types of birth control. Both parties should be kicked out of the service, dishonorably, for being damn stupid.

I bet a lot of the young blue jackets think 'I can't get pregnanti from just one ****' .... whereas the reality is that you always get pregnant from just one. If it's the right one....

And i wouldn't be surprised if some of the sailorettes are doing this deliberately to get shore duty.

28 posted on 03/02/2017 2:10:33 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Okay. Toss em.


29 posted on 03/02/2017 2:10:36 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

They should be able to reasonably estimate what percentage got pregnant before and after deployment. I would bet most are before deployment and is greater for those who already have a child.

I would also bet the fertility rate after deployment on a submarine would be small.


30 posted on 03/02/2017 2:12:10 PM PST by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

Sadly, this rings true. In fact, I’d be surprised if there *weren’t* some sort of pay-to-play going on under those circumstances.


31 posted on 03/02/2017 2:13:26 PM PST by Blurb2350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

Too many “missiles” deployed.


32 posted on 03/02/2017 2:20:18 PM PST by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

The birth rate in the U.S. is declining so the Navy has stepped up to fill the void.


33 posted on 03/02/2017 2:20:58 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philetus

How about using an birth-control implant, females???


34 posted on 03/02/2017 2:27:04 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Blurb2350

It is worse than folks let on.

In every rating there are a certain number of ship slots and land slots. So with that rating you spend so many years on a ship, and then so many years at shore, when you can have some sort of normal home life or perhaps pursue and marry a young lady.

Women getting pregnant take away the shore slots, which means sailors who were supposed to have a 18~24 month slot on dry land suddenly get shipped out to fill the empty berth. Totally unfair and a reason you cannot keep a lot of good personal in for a career, especially in some rating where there are not a lot of excess personnel.

It also causes all sort of difficulties on ship. Men together form deep male friendships and a lot of comradeship under adverse circumstances. Lasts a lifetime. Stick a few young fertile women in and it becomes a fight to see who gets laid by whom. No number of harassment classes can defeat basic biology. The comradeship goes by the wayside when every swinging d—k is trying to get entry into the few females around. It is very bad for discipline.

It is bad for the women. You take a objectively 4 or 5 attractiveness female and suddenly in a position where the males outnumber them 4 to 1 and guess what, they are , in that close quarters a 8 or a 9. They have never had such attention before and many act accordingly, they go full slut. Then they get out of the service and find that the inevitable wear and tear, along with the masculine manners they have unknowingly adopted make then a 3.5 or a 4.5 in the real world. It is very sad all round.

The entire social engineering is weakening the military, I expect it will take a real defeat, due to loss of cohesion under fire to cause reality to intrude on this utopian leftist dream of gender equality.


35 posted on 03/02/2017 2:36:30 PM PST by Frederick303
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

Must be something in the water.


36 posted on 03/02/2017 2:37:42 PM PST by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

Obama’s Comfort Women


37 posted on 03/02/2017 2:39:53 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

38 posted on 03/02/2017 2:40:29 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull
The problem is many get pregnant on purpose to miss deployment.

Exactly
They find ship life isn't all it's cracked up to be. Get pregnant.

39 posted on 03/02/2017 2:40:32 PM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

Sounds like it is time for the US Navy to return to the old military policy of discharging females when they became pregnant.


40 posted on 03/02/2017 2:40:44 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson