Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

My question has nothing—zero—to do with what I do or don’t believe. It has to do with your premise. You said there were too many people at that meeting for the report to be a lie. Well, what does it matter how many there were, if no one is talking? And how do you know someone is talking, if all you have is Fake News and unnamed sources?

My theory is that Trump wanted to catch the Dems flatfooted. They needed to respond to his speech. So he leaked a fake version, and the Dems prepared a response to it. Then he hit them with what he’d been planning to say all along, and they were deer-in-the-headlights gobsmacked.


90 posted on 03/01/2017 4:32:04 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

Exactly....


93 posted on 03/01/2017 4:34:39 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Fantasywriter

Sigh..havent you been watching DC for decades.

It leaks like a sieve....for decades.

Unnamed sources are the name of the game in DC...doesnt make it fake news


98 posted on 03/01/2017 4:39:49 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson