Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeadCounter

Thanks. He argued seven cases before the SCOTUS. He won two.

My main issue with Ted is his refusal to do everything in his power to help us make sure Hillary didn’t destroy this nation over the next four years.

5 to 7 Leftist Justices and Anthony Kennedy, is an absolute terrible thing to contemplate.

It just didn’t matter to Ted, who was almost mute for 100 days prior to the election.

The issue of him being a good litigator or not, is not something that is high on my agenda right now. The fact that he or any other attorney would have to argue before a court with 5 to 7 Leftist judges at the end of four or eight year is.

Ted? What were you thinking when you went AWOL last year?

This is just one issue, one way Hillary could have altered this nation almost irreversibly.


56 posted on 02/23/2017 7:03:50 PM PST by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

He defended (in private practice) the Obama stimulus, some matter with Texas Teachers: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/read-ted-cruzs-2009-defense-of-obamas-stimulus-as-an-aid-to-americas-economic-recovery_042015

Though he has not been for a path to citizenship, he has clearly been for H1B1 visas to handed out and a lot of green cards.

But what ticked me off is by the time the North Carolina primary came around, it was dirty tricks again.

At first I liked him a lot but too many dirty tricks, if he is considered for the SCOTUS, he might get the Romney treatment.


57 posted on 02/23/2017 7:27:33 PM PST by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson