Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy

These issues and how a Hillary Clinton presidency would have impacted them, meant nothing to Ted last year. He couldn’t muster the clarity of mind to realize she had to be opposed vigorously.

SCOTUS appointments
federal judges
national debt
our military
our state department
foreign policy
allies
enemies
a seeming desire to start WWIII with Russia
islamic immigration from terrorist nations
jobs
gun rights
our borders
sanctuary cities
the national bathroom situation / cross gender issue
taxation
obamacare
race relations
the epa
coal mines
the canadian oil pipeline through the U.S.
massive deregulation efforts
the wall
removing illegal aliens
removing criminal illegal aliens asap

and on and on it goes, literally thousands if not tens of thousands of issues

None of this motivated Ted to hound Hillary’s every move to make sure she didn’t become president

none the less, you come here to give me a hard time, and defend Ted.

keep the crayons for yourself


23 posted on 02/23/2017 4:51:37 PM PST by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
Impressive list. Let's take one, just for example: what you call "gun rights."

Cruz' record is clear on the subject, going back to his tenure as Texas AG. Did we have anything about Trump's record? Correct me if I'm wrong, but all we had was what Trump said (and now, his various Cabinet appointees who actually have a record on the subject themselves--which is positive).

I just have a little bit of trouble with folks who tell me that I should accept what a politician says on faith.

30 posted on 02/23/2017 5:12:03 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson