Why?
A suspicious person might think they were exploring ways to get into state election systems for clandestined purposes.
So, what would such clandestined purposes be? To see if they could manipulate voting results by adding or substracting votes?
==
Then, there is election night when the major news outlets [online and broadcast] ceased releasing count updates to the public for several hours. During that interim they were looking for votes or ways to manipulate totals in select locations. When they realized they would have to show precincts with 120% to 130% voting for a certain candidate to push her over the top, they knew the jig was up.
“When they realized they would have to show precincts with 120% to 130% voting for a certain candidate to push her over the top, they knew the jig was up.”
Cough...Detroit..cough...
Clandestine. There is no d.
A suspicious person might think Obama's DHS was exploring ways to get into state election systems for clandestined purposes. To see if they could manipulate voting results by adding or substracting votes?
==
Then, there's 2016 election night when the major news outlets [online and broadcast] ceased releasing count updates to the public for several hours. During that interim they were looking for votes or ways to manipulate totals in select locations. When they realized they would have to show precincts with 120% to 130% voting for a certain candidate to push her over the top, they knew the jig was up.