I’m not happy about a person being destroyed because he said something that I and many don’t agree with.
Speech isn’t a crime, even if the speech is f***ed up.
He wasn’t supporting pedophilia, but he did go somewhere that people in this country do not want to go, so that is a shame.
I understand why Breitbart can’t keep him as a result, brand and all, but I don’t want to see him destroyed.
I’d rather see a dialogue occur where it can be explained to him that this isn’t something that we want to have happen, in terms of adults having relations with teenagers.
That’s not, in fact, it’s wrong, but public destruction of him isn’t the right response either.
How exactly do you have a dialogue about these kinds of remarks?
Meanwhile, in the senate......
Making lite of adult child sexual abuse was a mistake.
Some of his comments made it seem he wasn’t convinced this sort of thing was wrong.
Things we all do in life cost us.
Why should he be any different?
I think the left is revenging themselves on Milo because in his “horrible statement” is the uncomfortable for the left truth that a lot of people are turned towards homosexuality via molestation...
This is how I see it...
Apparently, Breitbart is going mainstream now. That’s probably the real reason Milo was forced out. I wonder how Andrew would feel knowing his enterprise was intentionally giving up it’s position on offense.
Milo made his statement. At this time, I am willing to accept what he says at face value.