Posted on 02/20/2017 10:42:51 AM PST by johnk
The little douche is gay with pedophile leanings, clearly.
I read what he said. And I explained in in an earlier post. Maybe his molester was kindly. Maybe he chooses to look back on it and see it as a lovely sexual awakening. That is probably what a lot of gay men have “decided” to do with that memory. That isn’t pedophile leanings. It’s a mental distortion of theirs.
If he is simply playing a role, he’s doing some real damage to the Left so I say let him continue.
Well, you knew they’d fold, didn’t you? Naïve in the extreme to invite him. A pack of maroons if ever there was one.
Thank you, I appreciate your posting his response to this matter.
I do not believe Milo was advocating pedophilia or any sort of crimes against children, which is the worst thing on earth.
I’m not going to jump down his throat about what he said.
I do believe homosexual men are created by way of abuse and that it is a learned behavior.
I’m not sure what creates or motivates homosexual behavior in females.
Even though I am not gay and do not have any particular understanding of gay matters, I can see where he was going in terms of trying to explain how older gay men and younger gay men relate.
I’m giving the dude a pass, I don’t believe that he was speaking of heinous crimes that, in my opinion, should be punishable by death.
Amen.
Probably.
But let’s be really honest. This goes on in the heterosexual community with as much or more prevalence.
I reviewed the entire transcript. Milo sai MANY times that 13-year olds could give consent, that many were “aware” enough to give consent, “especially in the gay community,” (not sure why), and that sex with a 13-year old did not constitute pedophilia. He said pedophilia can only apply to someone over the age of puberty.
I find that silly and repulsive. Milo is on the extremely wrong side of this.
Bingo.
His whole, unvarnished interview is clear, and does not support his Facebook answers.
Have you considered that Milo is just playing a role for which he gets paid?
Have you considered that McStain is playing a role for which HE gets paid...BIG $$$ for?
Nice gig, if you can get it.
Welcome back, btw.
CPAC ain’t what it used to be
“They throw the word love around a lot. They don’t know what it means. They are predators always looking for more victims to destroy.”
I really wish more people understood this. My brother-in-law went to San Francisco for law school.
He is now married (to a guy) with 2 kids. (adopted obviously)
In high school he had many girl friends. He was constantly with a new girl every few months. He couldn’t keep his hands off them. A real ladies man.
One year in San Francisco, as they say in the town of Bedrock, and “we’ll have a gay old time...”
What happened there he has never spoken of.
There is no way to know if there even was a Fr. Michael.
Milo says things to be intentionally controversial and, as the French say, outré (out there). He is a professional provocateur ... and he is good at it. That is why he is so good at trolling the left and exposing their hypocrisy.
Apparently he trolls the right just as well.
Milo is practically single handedly challenging the entrenched leftist culture, a battle front that the right has ABANDONED to the media and Hollywood. You would have to be intellectually lazy not to recognize this.
Establishment GOPe, cucks & pundits only hope, pray, write books they expect us to buy and wait for young people to get mugged by reality and then move to the right. No proactive plan to win young people indoctrinated by leftist education. They like the status quo, they need the status quo!
Milo has taken the fight to the culture.
CPAC should have welcomed him with open arms based on his sole support and advocacy of the First Amendment on college campuses alone!
The never trumpers and cucks in CPAC leadership are uniting with the global Communists on the left to smear Milo! As they have always smeared people who stand up for the Constitution! They are not part of the true movement.
This attack on Milo was meant to destroy his effectiveness and cause Civil War on the Right....Judging by this thread, it was 100% effective.....Kudos to the Soros Wing of the Republican Party....
“Pedophilia is sexual attraction to prepubescent children. That is not what he was advocating.”
No, but boys from puberty to adulthood need to be protected from men who suffer from SSAD.
I’d change the age of consent for faggotry to 35.
Uh oh.
No wonder the left is having a field day, with this.
If you heard what Milo said, I’d hope you’re not with him.
LS, the transcript includes comments from “another man” in the interview, see below:
“Another man says: “The whole consent thing for me. It’s not this black and white thing that people try to paint it. Are there some 13-year-olds out there capable of giving informed consent to have Another man says: “The whole consent thing for me. It’s not this black and white thing that people try to paint it. Are there some 13-year-olds out there capable of giving informed consent to have sex with an adult, probably…”
Milo is rationalizing abuse because he was abused. It is one way to deal with those memories. He may feel differently at 40 than he does now. I’m sure the whole gay community does this with those memories. If the molester was kindly, they can get away with this rationalization.
Milo admits 18 is probably the right age of consent. Which means he does deep down know that the 13 year old giving consent isn’t truly able to cope with an abusive molestation situation.
This has been going on, gay and straight, pretty much forever. But now we know life is better when we respect our young teens and don’t get sexual gratification from people who don’t have enough wisdom to really give it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.