Is this fake news or has it been okayed to leak?
I’m sure the trouble makers waited...
They’ll go to Judge Robart to block it.
I can’t wait.
“The official said that green-card holders and dual citizens of the U.S. and any of those countries are exempt.”
Well, if they are green card holders or dual citizens, they might not be as dangerous.
Maybe.
IFf true....
not gunna fly with the AG’s who filed suit.
aint gunna fly with judge Robart and probably not the 3 judge 9th.
Green Card is not a travel document, it’s a residency document.
Left will be out protesting again causing damage.
It is urgent to close our borders to Iraqi and Syrian Refugees/immigrants.
The losing side (ISIS members and supporters) will be the ones fleeing this year. They can not stay in their homes - the neighbors they abused will hunt them down and kill them.
Best to leave them to their fate, rather than have them regroup in our country.
They (the courts) will magically block it the nanosecond it’s released, since the ACLU et al has had time to prepare for this one via the leaks ...
Credit should be given to Jay Sekulow for his thorough analysis of how to make the EO bulletproof and get the USSC ruling overwhelmingly in favor of the EO.
Jay carefully pointed out that the original EO did not specify circumstances for Green Card holders as those circumstances had been described in a related Directive. Jay proposed issuing a new EO that incorporated the contents of the related Directive and let Washington State refile their complaint against the new EO.
The importance of the new EO is that there is no argument that can be upheld against it. Therefore, the Supreme Court will rule in the President’s favor.
For those that think the Supreme Court will ‘find’ a way to overrule the President’s EO, see the podcast or Fox News interview with Jay Sekulow. Unless the Supreme Court would write to confer US constitutional rights on all the peoples of the world, there is nothing in the new EO that can be argued or twisted. The only sticking point of the previous EO was the plight of the Green Card holders not addressed in the first EO even though an associated Directive addressed it. Putting everything inside one document in a new EO prevents leftist judges from ignoring a related Directive while they go about shooting holes in their targeted EO.
It’s like an improbable traffic cop asking for a driver’s license, then writing a driver and impounding the driver’s careup because no proof of insurance was observed, even though it was never asked for.
Jay’s superb analysis teaches a simple lesson, that deceptive judges, lawyers, and pols will selectively attack one component of a policy that is separate while ignoring all components that make the entirety of the policy. The lesson solution is to put all the related policy components into one document so that no one can say it wasn’t viewable. It shouldn’t have to be that way, but then there shouldn’t be persons who play games in court.
Oh man. If only I ran a store selling poster board.
That said, another leak again. This one is said to be within the administration. Unless Trump okayed this, he has an in house mole.
So the “lone woofs” with green cards can go back to these countries to be trained by ISIS to kill Americans without having to go through a screening when they come back? Snowflakes aren’t our friends.
Too bad district judge Robart gets to dictate immigration policy from his courtroom.
im sure the enemies of this country disguised as embassy workers have thousands of green cards ready to hand out to anyone who states death to america. They have long term planners. where are ours. fire everyone who worked for obama travelgate type firings.
I read somewhere (Laura Ingraham?) that the existing court case has to be vacated before issuing the replacement? I don’t know anything about law so I probably misunderstood — does anyone understand that issue?
Yeh Baby! :-)
Of course, all someone from one of those seven restricted countries has to do is get a passport from an unrestricted country. I’m sure they could easily get a forged one. I wouldn’t object if he banned travel from all Middle Eastern countries except Israel.
Why back down? Why are green card holders exempt?
Weren’t the San Bernardino and Boston terrorists green card holders?