Will the former CIA director be hoist by his own petard?

American Spectator ^ | February 17, 2017 | By George Neumayr

[gaijin]

You can be a Muslim Director of CIA who once voted for a communist and personally approved all the visas for the Saudi 9-11 bombers:

No problem..!

Call the Russians and talk in general terms to get spun up for your new job..?

UNFORGIVABLE.

[CaptainMorgantown]

Bring back Flynn. He does not need Senate confirmation. Only Flynn can bring the perspective that he does on how the rise of ISIS was abetted by the past administration.

[gaijin]

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/08/27/cia-director-john-brennan-is-a-muslim-convert/

[Disestablishmentarian]

I hope Brennan is prosecuted.

[AndyJackson]

I can think of something besides his petard to hoist him by.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Fire all government workers hired under Obama.

[Farmer Dean]

I predict he will skip the country soon.

[Fedora]

Out of hatred for McGovernite liberals, a Republican president in the 1970s broke the law.

The basic point of the article is right, but this sentence is historically inaccurate as to the motive for Watergate, FWIW.

[Chickensoup]

Hopefully by the neck after a trial for treason

[Ann Archy]

Brennan is a NASTY Muslim Convert fro, everything I have read.

[dsc]

“Out of hatred for McGovernite liberals, a Republican president in the 1970s broke the law.”

Fake news.

Just because the evilstream misleadia were able to sell that lie doesn’t make it true.

[Rockitz]

Hopefully he’s sentenced to death for the murder of Michael Hastings...

[Terry Mross]

I pray for the day when these traitors start leaving the country. That will be the day we KNOW we are winning!

[Farmer Dean]

These scum will have to run like rabbits to avoid prison.

[Robert357]

We can hope that Blue for Democrats soon becomes prison orange.

[PCPOET7]

he needs to be put under a lie detector and if found deceptive he needs to be water boarded....I believe he has been a foreign agent since before (9-11)

[LanaTurnerOverdrive]

I for one, sir, will not be hoist. Ever.

[RonnG]

“Out of hatred for McGovernite liberals, a Republican president in the 1970s broke the law.
The basic point of the article is right, but this sentence is historically inaccurate as to the motive for Watergate, FWIW.”

Nixon was furious over the leaking of top secret information to the NY Times by a leftwing traitor working in the CIA as an analyst The information leaked concerned LBJ, more so than Nixon. That was the genesis of what later would be known as Watergate

[squidly]

There’s some kind of rule that says that headlines which end in a question mark, the answer is always no. But the old rules don’t seem to apply so much with Trump in the WH.