Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Man can't be tried in forgotten '72 cop-shooting case
Associated Press ^ | 2/16/2017 | Andrew Welsh-Huggins

Posted on 02/16/2017 12:53:41 PM PST by simpson96

COLUMBUS, Ohio — An 82-year-old man who was indicted, but never prosecuted, in the nonfatal shooting of an Ohio police officer almost 45 years ago cannot be tried now, a judge ruled Thursday.

The case against Charles Hays fell through the cracks, and prosecutors acknowledged the state neglected the case. But they said he never demanded a speedy trial.

Franklin County Judge Guy Reece dismissed the case Thursday, saying Ohio had at least two opportunities over the past four decades to bring Hays back for trial.

Those came when Hays was in jail in Kentucky and in prison in Connecticut on charges unrelated to the 1972 shooting of Columbus officer Niki "Nick" Cooper.

A speedy trial is a constitutional right, the judge said as he announced his decision.

"Not only is it important for the defendant, but it's also important for society as a whole to have a criminal case resolved in a timely manner," Reece said.

Cooper was shot in the left arm in March 1972 when he and his partner interrupted a burglary. Cooper never regained full use of the injured limb, and he died just over three years ago at 71.

Hays was shot twice by Cooper and left a paraplegic, according to court records.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ohio; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: VanShuyten

“The guy gets around for being a paraplegic.”

I was thinking the same, but those two stints in prison might have been from mischief prior to his wounding. That being said, some people could get into trouble from inside an iron lung.


21 posted on 02/16/2017 3:34:40 PM PST by PLMerite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

45 years???? That’s beyond unreasonable even if he didn’t ask for a speedy trial


22 posted on 02/16/2017 3:40:00 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Davy Crocket

Not on murder. No limitation for that

Forty five years is beyond the pale. State should admit the blew it and move on.


23 posted on 02/16/2017 3:41:38 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson