Posted on 02/11/2017 6:03:33 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
Back in the days of intense Harry Potter warfare, I wrote an "On Religion" column in which a very articulate mother explained why she was seriously considering homeschooling her child.
First of all, she said it was clear that her local public schools didn't take religion all that seriously. A kind of watered-down faith was OK, but she was sure that her family's intense religious beliefs and traditions would clash with the culture in nearby schools. She didn't want to have to compromise her family's beliefs in order to fit in.
Then there those omnipresent books about a certain young wizard. She told me:
"The whole Harry Potter thing has just taken off and glamorized everything. It makes it seem like all of this is about spells and magic. ... It can be hard to get children to remember that what we're about is faith and spirituality. ... Many pagan parents consider Harry Potter a mixed blessing."
This mother, you see, was part of the Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids and the author of a book called "Pagan Parenting." And she was preparing for life as a homeschooling mom.
I thought about this anecdote when I read the NBCNews.com piece that ran with this headline: "DeVos Backlash Sees Parents Threatening to Homeschool Kids."
All kinds of people were passing this URL around online, laughing at the irony of that statement. However, it quickly became clear that reporter Jon Schuppe not only saw the irony, but understood it. Here is the overture on this surprisingly nuanced piece:
Among the initial opposition to Betsy DeVos' confirmation this week as education secretary were calls on social media by parents, including liberals, to start homeschooling their children.
That reaction to DeVos – a billionaire school-choice advocate who has never worked, attended or sent her kids to a public school – reflects how polarizing her nomination was.
It also comes layered with paradox. That's because DeVos, whom the Senate confirmed Tuesday to head the Education Department, is herself a big proponent of homeschooling.
The NBC piece backed that up with this direct quote from DeVos:
"We've seen more and more people opt for homeschooling, including in urban areas. What you're seeing is parents who are fed up with their lack of power to do anything about where their kids are assigned to go to school. To the extent that homeschooling puts parents back in charge of their kids' education, more power to them."
But, wait, aren't homeschoolers all rightwing Calvinist or trad-Catholic types who dress their minivan-stretching families in clothing inspired by the Little House On The Prairie fashion guides?
Schuppe accurately notes that the truth is more complex than that. Yes, the norm in homeschooling land tends to be "conservative Christians who resist government oversight." That's the negative way of stating their motives, but that is accurate. However, this piece also notes – again, this is accurate – that members of the homeschooling movement "span the political spectrum."
At some point, you know that the story is going to have to turn to an expert to explain some of these details.
In this case, NBC – I would assume an online search did the trick (finding the book "Homeschool: An American History") – found an academic at an evangelical Protestant school that is known as a rather progressive campus. This is not the kind of place where one automatically expects to find a DeVos fan club.
This passage from the piece is a bit long, but it's essential:
Until her nomination, DeVos served as chairwoman of the American Federation of Children, a group that advocates for education savings accounts, which redirect public school funds for use by parents to pay for other options, including expenses associated with homeschooling. DeVos could push for states to implement them.
"DeVos would love nothing better than for parents to decide to spend their money on private Christian schools ... or to homeschool them using Christian curriculums," said Milton Gaither, an education professor at Messiah College in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, who researches the homeschool movement and wrote a book about it.
Asked whether it seemed ironic that some liberals were now talking about homeschooling, Gaither said no: In a sense, those potential converts would mark a return to the fold of left-wing parents who gave helped give birth to the movement in the early 1970s.
"If they take it seriously enough and do it, they will find themselves in world populated by conservative Christians and people like Betsy DeVos," he said.
Once again, the wording in this part of the piece – take that "education savings accounts" reference – is accurate, but rather one-sided. Many activists on the DeVos side of that argument would say that parents are, in effect, receiving some of their own tax dollars back from the government so that they can choose what to do with those funds. Yes, this form of choice is fiercely opposed by the public-school establishment and by many who see this as a violation of church-state separation (since many parents choose faith-driven educational alternatives, including homeschooling materials).
The bottom line: There was much more to this story than an ironic chuckle or two.
This is a topic worthy of further exploration, if only to probe whether there are many feminist homeschoolers, LGBTQ homeschoolers, liberal Jewish homeschoolers, progressive Catholic homeschoolers and others who simply don't fit into the templates of America's educational establishment. To what degree have these niche-busters made the full leap into being pro-choice on matters of educational funding?
Bravo to the NBC News team for recognizing that this issue exists. You see, irony is a good thing, especially when it leads to interesting information.
North Carolina has very limited requirements, and they’ve grown more agreeable since Republicans took over the legislature.
OH, ow. I find that bad for my spine, while simply hanging head-over gives me a sinus headache.
I remember a while back, at least 15 years ago, there was a black public school principal in Washington, D.C., who wanted to order the Calvert School curriculum for each of the students in his school. It would have cost much less than the materials they were buying. (In the $750/student range.)
However, the school board would not allow it because a curriculum with a solid academic basis is racist.
It’s so anti-woman to say she never worked. The PC and more accurate thing to say is she never worked outside the home but in Betsy’s case I’m sure she had a staff of workers who helped her with her charities and advocacy. I guess what they mean is that she never drew a paycheck.
So, I guess the lapdog media will be all FOR homeschooling, now that liberals want to do it. They’ll consider it a real put-down of Betsy DeVos. Somehow, I don’t think she’ll be losing any sleep over it, but it could help conservative homeschoolers, because I don’t think the libs will put up with the crap we conservative homeschoolers have had to endure for years!
There has been an explosion of online teaching modules and videos in the past 6 years, or so. Our kids are long out of high school, but our 27 yr. old son loves the Khan Academy videos, and finds them extremely well done. But then he also likes "Drunk History", which if you don't mind the slurring and bleeping when folks curse, has some very interesting historical info, done in an engaging manner!
Even libs recognize the the benefits of homeschooling..... parents have more control, flexibility to pursue special interests, provide unique opportunities, efficient use of time, ability to provide higher quality, tailored programs of study.
Judging from the rest of the sentence, I think the writer was trying to say that Ms. DeVos never worked in a public school.
I’m adding your tagline to the Mrs. Don-o Deluxe Tag-Line Collectors’ Series.
Well and succinctly said. Oft thought but ne’er so well expressed.
Because the local “conservative” homeschoolers groups were all tied to membership in specific churches/evangelical fellowships, we belonged to a “liberal” homeschoolers’ support group for almost 10 years: pagans, seculars, left-libertarians and the occasional Democrat.
It was a worthwhile group. They didn’t hassle us for being Catholic and even bringing religious themes into the projects we shared. For the most part. (I had to convince one pagan mom that if it was OK for her kid to picture Gaia, it was OK for mine to do Noah.)
Liberal homeschoolers are OK. Like us, they’ve probably more independent-minded than most other members of the herd.
As Jesse Jackson was heard to chant:
Appreciate you saying this Mrs. Don-o!
Have you read the ESSA reauthorization of No Child Left Behind? There is some language dealing with PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE in that bill money follows child, etc...so I am interested to see how far DeVos will go to relinquish curriculum control.
I’m quoting Jonah Goldberg, but his name wouldn’t fit in the tagline field. I believe he also said you were an (adjective) moron or even an (expletive) moron.
We met quite a lot of liberal homeschoolers doing science competition, especially the Envirothon. As long as their child memorizes the soil levels correctly or can calculate the movement of glaciers, I don’t care if they worship Gaia or nobody.
No, I have not seen it. Earlier iterations of NCLB had some options for children to move from failing schools to more successful ones, but I believe that was largely shortcircuited by the states’ claiming that every school was successful.
I believe the contention was that you simply could not expect minority students to learn what white students do. The situation has remained in my memory because it was so shocking, although expressing this “reasoning” has become more commonplace, on both the right and the left, over the last decade or so.
The ESSA reauthorization was the equivalent of the Gang of 8 in immigration. You can image how hard that issue was to get attention of the dangers coming. You may want to read activist ANITA HOGE’s articles.
>> I’d like to see her file a zero budget for the agency.
Bingo!
I’ve been saying since the start that I wish to see her oversee the dismantling of the DoEd. Let her be the one to turn out the lights and turn the keys for the building over to the DoEd, and work herself out of a job.
The history of the DoEd has coincided with a steady decline in K-12 educational outcomes, and perhaps college ones as well. It should exist why, exactly?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.