Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pinkbell

Then there is this: Trump finally had to veto Tillerson’s effort to bring in the neocon/Bush holdover Elliott Abrams:

http://nypost.com/2017/02/10/rex-tillerson-and-trump-clash-over-state-department-deputy/

Abrams had trashed Trump during the campaign:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/10/politics/elliott-abrams-trump-state-department-tillerson/


26 posted on 02/11/2017 1:05:46 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

Yep. Trump should not have had to do that because Tillerson should not have tried to bring him in. I would have ran the other way from anyone endorsed by Condi, Bob Gates, and Cheney. After all, wasn’t Trump critical of foreign policy under both Bush and Obama?

I still don’t understand why he didn’t take Rudy - a man who fully supported his vision, campaigned for it, and is a true, loyal friend.


27 posted on 02/11/2017 1:42:01 AM PST by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/11/cnn-lies-multiple-times-to-help-hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson