I would never advocate a terrorist attack to prove a point nor would I advocate circumventing the Constitution either.
The Court said the Government failed to show a risk of terrorist attack from the countries named. They looked at policy rather than law, even giving weight to statements made by candidate Trump and Rudy Giuliani.
Having included material that was outside the scope of the order, they’ve set the bar. If anything were to happen, how would they explain it away?
I think the Administration will do something. In watching the President interact with the press this evening, I get a feeling that there is a lot more to this than meets the eye. Especially now that Assad has said that some terrorists have secured passports.
This Executive Order was put in place a week ago. We just came off 8 years of open borders. Our sense of security has been at risk for quite a while.
“Having included material that was outside the scope of the order, they’ve set the bar. If anything were to happen, how would they explain it away?”
They don’t have to explain it, or anything else, away. That is the nature of Leftist tyranny, they are right because they say they are.
Nevertheless, the court of public opinion is already on Trump’s side and that hasn’t stopped them from the coup-de-tat. Public opinion will not decide this, the next election is two tears away.
The administration needs to do something because as it stands, the President is neutered on national security, immigration and border control.