Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican

The history of rule 19 is interesting.

A rat Senator was SC was mad that the state’s other Senator was working with Republicans on some issues!!!! So he insulted him on the Senate floor. The other guy wasn’t there but heard about and rushed to the floor to confront him, the instigator then attacked him. Both were censured.

https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/censure_cases/090Tillman_Laurin.htm

Reminds me of the famous caning of Senator Sumter.

I found this

http://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=50707

I laughed.

But the incident was an outrage, Brooks should have been expelled and sent to prison for attempted murder. It seems he was not punished at all, though perhaps he was by God, as he died painfully a few years later.


23 posted on 02/11/2017 12:58:36 AM PST by Impy (Toni Preckwinkle for Ambassador to the Sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

I’m someone who has offered a vigorous defense of Congressman Brooks, after having read the actual (and not whitewashed) version of events. Sumner was deliberately attempting to incite a ruckus by viciously attacking Brooks’ relative, SC Sen. Andrew Pickens Butler. Sumner chose to do so when Butler was not present in the Senate, a shameful action, as Butler could not answer the charges made. Sen. Stephen Douglas was present when Sumner went on the attack, remarking to a colleague that his comments were going to get someone killed.

Someone went and alerted Brooks about the speech, and he deliberated as to the proper response. Sen. Butler was apparently content to let the speech not get to him, since he knew Sumner was a blowhard (Butler was also not someone who could challenge Sumner to a physical altercation, as he was an older man, by that era’s standards, and in declining health). Brooks was not so willing to let it go, and after concluding Sumner was no gentleman, indeed, about on the same level as a rabid dog (cur, as they would say), he could not challenge him to a duel. He decided that he should be properly flogged (hence, he could not have been charged with attempted murder - he was not trying to kill him).

As Sumner was on the floor of the Senate, Brooks and his fellow SC colleague, Laurence Keitt, went to confront him (this was days after the original speech). Rep. Keitt stood by to halt any attempt for the flogging with the gutta-percha cane be interrupted by any bystanders as Brooks pummeled Sumner until the cane snapped, concluding the incident. Both Brooks and Keitt resigned and then promptly won back their seats in special elections held, with Brooks being sent scores of brand new gutta-percha canes by admirers.

As you cited, Brooks would die the following year from illness. His relative, Sen. Butler, would die the same year as well. Keitt would die during the Civil War. Sumner would not return to the Senate for several years, being reelected in absentia (and milking his beating for all it was worth). Sumner was, and has been portrayed as a hero, but frankly, he was doing everything possible to foment divisional hatred and bring about war. This was an example of a radical politician whose mouth wrote a check his ass couldn’t cash.


24 posted on 02/11/2017 3:34:08 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson