Posted on 02/07/2017 6:26:56 AM PST by detective
The United Nations envoy for gay rights has declared that when there is a clash between homosexual rights and religious liberty it must be recalled that freedom of expression and religious freedom are not absolute rights and may be limited if necessary.
In a recent public consultation, the UNs newly appointed independent expert on the defense of LGTB rights, Vitit Muntarbhorn, said that negative moral judgments on homosexual activity were a recent phenomenon, stemming from colonial law.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
African nations will fight. The U.S. won’t.
Freedom of Religion reigns supreme.
Except when it conflicts with liberal/leftist/democrat appetites, cravings, wants, desires, views, urges, thoughts, feelings or anything else.
We worship the Creator.
Liberals worship the adulterer and the masturbater.
This is why the UN must be thrown out of the US...
Fun to go into nice bars. Barkeep expects her to get something frou-frou, with extra fruit and umbrellas. Instead, she orders the "that 21 Year old single-malt, with just one ice cube, please". Fun to watch the open-mouthed stares she gets.
Hmmm
If length of time is the issue then negative views on religious beliefs is an even MORE recent development.
So....
In a recent public consultation, the UNs newly appointed independent expert on the defense of LGTB rights, Vitit Muntarbhorn, said that negative moral judgments on homosexual activity were a recent phenomenon, stemming from colonial law.
...
I’m beginning to think that colonialism wasn’t such a bad thing.
THAT is what it is all about...they reserve the right to be thrown off buildings by Muslims because they hate Christians for having absolutes. Christians say what is right, but we are not torturing anyone for doing wrong. That is up to their consciences.
(not to be flippant, but they sound like NAZIs)
Why aren’t we tearing down that fowl building yet?
The chicken coop?
Which is it? That's a simple biological question - not a religious one.
HOMOSEXUAL, because there's nothing GAY about it.
Yes. Including whatever animal facilities about the place that provide their foul entertainment.
freedom of expression and religious freedom are not absolute rights and may be limited if necessary.
....................
So he’s saying expression of homosexuality and secular humanism isn’t a right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.