Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/04/2017 4:35:48 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: NYer

How dare trump think he could do what obama has done for 8 years


2 posted on 02/04/2017 4:37:23 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

Whenever means whenever.

Any means ANY.

Bottom line: had he wanted to ban all Muslims, he could have easily done so and been well within his rights to do so.

3 posted on 02/04/2017 4:40:11 AM PST by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Time to remove judge Jimmy from office for misbehavior. It would serve to nip this lawlessness in the bud.


6 posted on 02/04/2017 4:51:30 AM PST by TheDon (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

To paraphrase another great President: the judge has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.


7 posted on 02/04/2017 4:54:14 AM PST by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Grab him as an enemy combatant and send the judge to Gitmo and waterboard him. Then ignore his ruling.


9 posted on 02/04/2017 4:57:09 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

More of the stench from the bench. These little mini dictators in their blackrobes do not make laws. If they won’t enforce the law, remove them. The people have had enough of the blackrobed tyrants.


10 posted on 02/04/2017 5:00:40 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

They’re trying to set him up for impeachment as soon as possible. I don’t want him falling into that trap. I think he needs to become acquainted with his veto powers. It looks like it’s time to grind things to a halt and leave them that way until we can all come to an understanding about how things are and how they’re going to be.


11 posted on 02/04/2017 5:02:57 AM PST by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

This is “Lawfare” at work. Use our own laws to destroy us “legally.”


14 posted on 02/04/2017 5:20:21 AM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
The writer nailed it.

Judge Robart, who was appointed by George W. Bush (should we be surprised, or not?) has clearly usurped his authority. The case clearly has no plaintiffs with standing or any kind of validity. At most Judge Robart should have stayed his decision pending appeal to circuit courts. His radical injunction smacks of a judicial coup, of a single federal district judge asserting his authority over the entire executive branch. His arguments for doing so are unconstitutional, as is his manner of issuing the order. We are living in a time when judicial Ayatollahs are usurping the power of our elected officials, and it is very much like a judicial coup.

17 posted on 02/04/2017 5:32:51 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

This judge is on the extreme left geographically and philosophically. Radical, unconstitutional rulings by judges should, after appropriate consideration, be ignored.


26 posted on 02/04/2017 6:09:50 AM PST by lakecumberlandvet (APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

How quickly can the DOJ get this before an appellant court?? or - can they take straight to the Supremes?


27 posted on 02/04/2017 6:10:37 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Trump should say: we will take the case directly to the Supreme Court and meanwhile let the judge try to enforce it, with no federal district attorneys, secret service, federal marshals, FBI or any other force doing his bidding.


31 posted on 02/04/2017 6:25:11 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

NYer

Thanks for posting!

Excellent points made by a lawyer that went to same school as nominee Gorsuch

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3521256/posts?page=1#1

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3521256/posts?page=32#32


33 posted on 02/04/2017 6:30:13 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

It is a travesty that a couple hundred lower level judges around the country can function as a power above the congress and the president over the entire nation. At most, such a judge should have authority only in their own district. Personally I wouldn’t allow even that. I’d instead allow them + appeals, if their issue survives appeals, expedited access to the scotus.

The idea of little dictators around the country is obscene.


34 posted on 02/04/2017 6:31:37 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

If this is a “muslim ban” then, under that logic, stopping illegals from mexico is really a catholic ban.


35 posted on 02/04/2017 6:34:45 AM PST by scope721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

The judge was appointed by GWB.


38 posted on 02/04/2017 6:37:46 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

It figures that a whining mangina simp libtart from the Left Coast would do such an act, as a judge.


39 posted on 02/04/2017 6:37:48 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
If you read the ruling as I have, you can see this is clearly unconstitutional on its face, and constitutes a judicial coup against President Trump and the executive branch.

We all know this.

The $64,000 question now is: "Where does this go?"

Is it appealed to the Supreme Court? Does the Trump administration ignore the judge's unconstitutional order?

What?

42 posted on 02/04/2017 6:43:55 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Trump needs to simply ignore the “order”. The president doesn’t have power but only if the judiciary allows.


45 posted on 02/04/2017 6:56:37 AM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Judicial islamist facilitation.


48 posted on 02/04/2017 7:01:29 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson