Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(2nd LD) U.S. defense chief in Seoul for talks over North Korea
Yonhap News ^ | 2017/02/02

Posted on 02/02/2017 5:55:46 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

(2nd LD) U.S. defense chief in Seoul for talks over North Korea

(ATTN: ADDS Mattis' meetings in 4th para, USFK Commander Gen. Vincent Brooks comment in last 2 paras)

SEOUL, Feb. 2 (Yonhap) -- U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis on Thursday began his two-day visit to South Korea in his first overseas trip aimed at underscoring the U.S. security commitment to the Asian ally amid growing threats from North Korea.

After landing at Osan Air Base in Pyeongtaek, 70 kilometers south of Seoul, at 12:30 p.m., Mattis headed to the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) headquarters in Yongsan, Seoul, according to the defense ministry.

Mattis was briefed by USFK Commander Gen. Vincent Brooks on the security situation on the Korean Peninsula and in the region, including Seoul-Washington's joint readiness against North Korean threats that include that it is close to test-firing an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of reaching the U.S. mainland, military officials said.

He then met with Acting President and Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn and National Security Office chief Kim Kwan-jin and attended a dinner event hosted by Defense Minister Han Min-koo at a Seoul hotel.

Hwang is currently serving as acting president after President Park Geun-hye was impeached by the National Assembly over a corruption scandal.

On Friday, Mattis plans to hold separate meetings with defense chief Han and Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se to discuss North Korea and alliance issues.

Mattis' trip, which also includes a stop in Japan later this week, is aimed at reassuring the key allies unsettled by U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign rhetoric accusing them of free-riding on U.S. security commitments.

During his campaign, Trump said wealthy allies like South Korea and Japan should pay more for the upkeep of American troops stationed on their soil and if not, the U.S. military should withdraw.

On the flight to Seoul, Mattis told reporters that he will talk with his South Korean counterparts about the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system "absolutely."

"It is a defensive system. There is only one reason we would have this under discussion right now -- that is, North Korea's activities," Mattis said, according to foreign media reports.

In July 2016, Seoul and Washington agreed to deploy the THAAD system to South Korea this year to better defend against North Korea's nuclear and missile threats.

But China has opposed the deployment on concerns that the move could hurt its strategic security interests. The U.S. has repeatedly stressed that the system is defensive and aimed only at deterring North Korean threats.

Asked if the U.S. will push forward the THAAD deployment as planned, Gen. Brooks told Yonhap News Agency Thursday, "We are gonna continue ... as planned."

He said in early November that he expects the advanced U.S. missile defense system to be deployed within eight to 10 months.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mattis; nkorea; skorea; thaad

Mattis and Acting S. Korean President


1 posted on 02/02/2017 5:55:46 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; ...

P!


2 posted on 02/02/2017 5:56:24 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Fredo was in charge for 8 years and now Michael is in charge. And the five families are in a lot of trouble.


3 posted on 02/02/2017 6:00:40 AM PST by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Ping!


4 posted on 02/02/2017 6:03:10 AM PST by KC_Lion ("I'm a believer that you don't need a title, and you don't need an office to make a difference"~S.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
To hell with China they could reign in their lap dog if they wanted to. Missie defense is a no brainer and I would threaten nukes for South Korea and Japan. If we really wanted to shake things up start working with Taiwan on a peaceful nuke energy program similar to Iran.
5 posted on 02/02/2017 6:53:49 AM PST by soupbone1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

6 posted on 02/02/2017 8:24:49 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

On the job. Our allies have never had as good a friend as they have now in the White House.


7 posted on 02/02/2017 8:28:30 AM PST by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

8 posted on 02/03/2017 4:47:30 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo

Lankov: Decades of experience has demonstrated neither sanctions nor negotiations will work. Both have been tried, and both failed, in rather spectacular fashion.

Partial and imperfect solutions are possible - like, say, a negotiated freeze of North Korea’s nuclear program. However, North Korea will remain nuclear as long as the Kim family stays in power, which might mean a few more years, or a few more decades.

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2017/02/304_222555.html


9 posted on 02/04/2017 9:28:44 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Eberstadt:

First: North Korea is embarked on a steady, methodical, and relentless journey, whose intended endpoint is a credible capacity to hit New York and Washington with nuclear weapons.

Second: America’s policy for nuclear nonproliferation in North Korea is a prolonged, and thoroughly bipartisan, failure.

Third: Our North Korea policy is a failure because our public and our leaders do not understand our adversary and his intentions.

Fourth: We cannot hope to cope successfully with the North Korean threat until we do.

Fifth: Any successful effort to make the North Korean threat smaller will require not just better understanding of this adversary, but also a coherent and sustained strategy of threat reduction informed by such an understanding.

https://www.aei.org/publication/from-engagement-to-threat-reduction-moving-toward-a-north-korea-policy-that-works/


10 posted on 02/04/2017 9:31:26 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Book Review: “North Korea’s Juche Myth”

http://38north.org/2016/07/bksilberstein070116/


11 posted on 02/04/2017 9:33:00 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
This man has an interesting history. He was for pro-appeasement for a while and became against it for several years. Now he is back to his old position.
Most of the blame for current mess goes to China. China is the only reason sanction has not been as effective as hoped. However, Lankov is somehow not keen on taking China to the task. He refuses to consider the only viable way to solve this problem without military confrontation.

It is time China should be placed on sanction. It is confident that it is too big to fail. Let's see if they are willing to take 45% tariff just to keep their junk yard dog alive.

12 posted on 02/04/2017 9:44:42 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

I think Juche is both for domestic and international consumption. The regime’s key argument for its legitimacy is that it stands up resolutely against external enemies who are threatening their way of lives. That is, they refuse to not follow the corrupt way of prostituting themselves to be slaves of decadent west.


13 posted on 02/04/2017 9:58:46 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Correction:

That is, they refuse to not follow

14 posted on 02/04/2017 10:10:56 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson