"so long as you don't call your religious beliefs "science"." And wow man, by who's authority do you issue that command from? lol. Anyways, your fight is not with me but that of denying God. You'll figure it out one day.
No, it's not my "perception", it's what scientists have consistently, and increasingly accurately, reported for the past 100+ years.
In recent decades the number of tools available for estimating geological ages has grown exponentially, from one or two (i.e., carbon-14 dating) to now dozens of radiometric and other methods.
As for Earth's rotation & revolution, those were hypothesized even in ancient times, but not confirmed as theory until the Age of Exploration and men sailing around the globe.
Today's it's confirmed fact, from cameras in space.
Likewise, the ages of geological materials are also confirmed based on numerous independent methodologies arriving at similar times.
VaeVictis: " 'so long as you don't call your religious beliefs 'science'.
And wow man, by who's authority do you issue that command from? lol."
US law forbids the teaching of religion as "science" in public schools, has now for many years.
Definitions of just what is, or is not, science are, by law, in the hands of scientists themselves, not anti-scientists such as VaeVictis.
VaeVictis: "Anyways, your fight is not with me but that of denying God.
You'll figure it out one day."
Sorry, but I have no argument with God, because I don't believe God has any beef with science.
Indeed I think God wants us to understand something of how He did & does it.
That, at least, has been a basic assumption behind what was centuries ago called "natural philosophy" and around the time of our Founders became "natural science".
Today's science is short for our Founders' "natural science", which began as an exploration of God's good works.
Neither they nor I believed the Bible forbids such enquiries.
Do you?